[uf-new] Re: Comment Questions

[Sarven Capadisli]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Martin McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
> Martin McEvoy wrote:
>>
>> Toby A Inkster wrote:
>>>
>>> Martin McEvoy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Toby A Inkster wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > What's wrong with simply using hAtom as it is (possibly with the
>>>> > addition of Sarven's "in-reply-to" proposal)
>
> [...edit...]
>>>>
>>>> Ok lets re-use hatom terms only this works...
>>>>
>>>> <div class="hentry">
>>>>  <address class="author vcard">
>>>>      <span class="entry-title"><a class="url fn"
>>>> href="http://contributor.com/blog/">Contributor</a> said</span>
>>>>  </address>
>>>>  about <abbr class="updated" title="2008-09-01T14:40:45+01:00">72 days
>>>> ago</abbr>,
>>>>  <div class="entry-content">
>>>>     <p>Hey Great Post</p>
>>>>   </div>
>>>>  <a rel="bookmark" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>
>>>> </div>
>>>>
>>>> Is this proposed mark up acceptable there is a test page here:
>>>> http://weborganics.co.uk/test/test.html
>>>>
>>>> and the extracted Atom Is here:
>>>> http://transformr.co.uk/hatom/http://weborganics.co.uk/test/test.html
>>>>
>
> I have updated the comment brainstorming pages, the Schema[1] strictly
> re-uses hAtom[2] terms


<address> is misused there and is an open issue [1].

One way of going at it: http://csarven.ca/my-responses-are-in-white

[1] http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom-issues#misuse_of_address_element

-Sarven