[uf-new] Re: Comment Questions

[Martin McEvoy]

David Janes wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Martin McEvoy
> <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
>   
>> David Janes wrote:
>>     
>>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Sarven Capadisli <csarven at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> As Tantek suggested, it would be better to keep our focus on the
>>>> instance of a comment. If I'm understanding this correctly, it means:
>>>> what makes this a comment in and of it self?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> I think that's framing the discussion to achieve a particular answer.
>>> Where does this lonely comment exist in the real world?
>>>
>>> I suggest that the best approach this exactly the same hAtom:
>>> - look at the real world examples
>>> - find a minimal solution that covers at least 80% of the examples and
>>> doesn't require presentation impact
>>> - see if that solution can be expanded afterward to cover edge cases &
>>> other interesting things (nesting, for example)
>>>
>>> Regards, etc...
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> I think there is a different discussion concerning "comments" [1] maybe your
>> thoughts need to go there?
>>
>> [http://microformats.org/wiki/comments-formats]
>>
>> Thanks
>>     
>
> This is not a discussion of formats, it's a discussion of what people
> do. How can you discuss creating a microformat if you're not
> discussing what people are doing?
>
>   
I cant answer that David, the discussion needs to be consolidated and 
re-thought (the same as this discussion was)

Thanks

-- 
Martin McEvoy

http://weborganics.co.uk/