[uf-new] hAudio issue D2 "title"

[Scott Reynen]

On [Sep 2], at [ Sep 2] 11:52 , David Janes wrote:

> hItem/item was intended to do more than that -- it was to bring in a
> number of commonly used class names (e.g. "fn") so we don't have these
> year long discussions about how to do things that really the answer is
> already known.


I completely misunderstood the intent of this proposal as being  
specific to physical objects and commerce.  Now that I understand this  
proposal better, I prefer it to MFO, as it puts the emphasis on the  
content being published (where it belongs) rather than on parsing  
rules.  I'll retract my earlier suggestion to build on the MFO work  
and instead suggest building on the item work:

http://microformats.org/wiki/items-brainstorming

Further, I propose merging the two, as they're basically the same  
proposal from two different angles.

--
Scott Reynen
MakeDataMakeSense.com