[uf-new] New proposal: Elemental microformat for content
boundaries
David Janes
davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Tue Apr 28 04:51:28 PDT 2009
Seconded.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Jeremy Keith <jeremy at adactio.com> wrote:
>>> The weakest parts of hAtom right now are the required element issues.
>>
>> True. Not every piece of arbitrary content may have date, author and
>> title. Content may just have text.
>
> I concur. But I think that rather than looking at creating a new format,
> we'd be better off relaxing the required content rules for hAtom.
>
> Shall we move this over to the discuss list and kick start the discussion
> there?
>
> There are already some issues raised on the hAtom issues page, such as the
> author requirement (probably the most frustrating requirement):
>
> http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom-issues#author_as_an_hcard_is_too_much_to_require
>
> --
> Jeremy Keith
>
> a d a c t i o
>
> http://adactio.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
>
--
David Janes
Mercenary Programmer
http://code.davidjanes.com
More information about the microformats-new
mailing list