[uf-new] restarting the [citation] microformat effort

Tim White tjameswhite at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 10:07:52 PDT 2012


No, sorry, I was't referring to you (I haven't actually ready all of
your responses in detail.. : ) -- I was referring to what happened in
the past. From what I remember the discussion kept heading toward "we
need to map every possible item" which is why it stalled.


On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Ed Summers <ehs at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Tim White <tjameswhite at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It looks like, after just a quick glance, that that is what you are
>> going for. No one seemed to understand that we needed to start with a
>> small, specific problem, get it working, *then* we can fill in more
>> detail as (if) needed. All of Dublin core doesn't need to be mapped.
> I didn't mean to imply that DC should be mapped. My apologies if it
> came across that way.
>> I'll try to find some time to look over your brainstorming in more detail.
> Just curious, if you are interested in something easy to implement
> (and use) have you looked at schema.org's Book for use in HTML5
> microdata [1]?
> //Ed
> [1] http://schema.org/Book
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new

More information about the microformats-new mailing list