social-network-portability-faq

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
(added initial form fill vs. update of info problem)
Current revision (18:40, 27 November 2007) (view source)
(added link to Identity problem article)
 
Line 49: Line 49:
''Does OpenID provide people with a way to create a globally unique identifier for themselves?''
''Does OpenID provide people with a way to create a globally unique identifier for themselves?''
* OpenID does not <em>create</em> a globally unique identifier for a person. It is URL (by way of DNS) that <em>creates</em> a globally unique identifier (whether or a person or other purpose), not OpenID. What OpenID does do is add <em>authentication</em> on top of having a globally unique URL that is itself a globally unique identifier, that is, OpenID is a way of asserting that you "own" or otherwise control a particular URL to another service/site. The essential quality of being a globally unique identifier is present in a URL even without OpenID. Thus, no, it is not OpenID that ''creates'' a ''globally unique identifier'', rather, simply using a ''URL'' creates a globally unique identifier.  A URL ''by itself'' can be used as a basis for portable social networks, since it provides a way of referring to a single person that makes sense across the whole Web.  And as such, people can (and will) create multiple URLs that represent them, so a method of enabling people to tie their URLs together (e.g. [[XFN]]'s rel="me") becomes important.  However, by adding authentication, OpenID can enhance existing globally unique identifier URLs for people, by permitting authenticated access to (perhaps more information in) profiles and social networks represented at those URLs using microformats.
* OpenID does not <em>create</em> a globally unique identifier for a person. It is URL (by way of DNS) that <em>creates</em> a globally unique identifier (whether or a person or other purpose), not OpenID. What OpenID does do is add <em>authentication</em> on top of having a globally unique URL that is itself a globally unique identifier, that is, OpenID is a way of asserting that you "own" or otherwise control a particular URL to another service/site. The essential quality of being a globally unique identifier is present in a URL even without OpenID. Thus, no, it is not OpenID that ''creates'' a ''globally unique identifier'', rather, simply using a ''URL'' creates a globally unique identifier.  A URL ''by itself'' can be used as a basis for portable social networks, since it provides a way of referring to a single person that makes sense across the whole Web.  And as such, people can (and will) create multiple URLs that represent them, so a method of enabling people to tie their URLs together (e.g. [[XFN]]'s rel="me") becomes important.  However, by adding authentication, OpenID can enhance existing globally unique identifier URLs for people, by permitting authenticated access to (perhaps more information in) profiles and social networks represented at those URLs using microformats.
 +
* See also "[http://segala.com/blog/identity-the-most-widely-misuse-term-by-internet-experts/ OpenID does not prove identity.]"

Current revision

Social Network Portability FAQ

This page documents frequently asked questions (FAQ) about social network portability.

Contents


Do microformats or any standard make all my social info portable

Do microformats or any standard make all my social info portable across social network sites?

Is the Web itself a social network

Isn't the Web itself a social network minus some proprietary software?

Precisely, the Web (plus a few open data formats) is itself a social network platform.

The key is, what are the minimal simple open data formats to describe the 80/20 of that social internetwork.

When XFN was introduced back in 2003, the choices of relationship values were based on real world uses of what relationships people were already publishing in their visible blog rolls on their blogs. The hypothesis being that blogs + blogrolls already presented us with a giant distributed social network (in contrast to the dominant social silo of the time, Friendster).

With hCard, one can easily capture, publish and share the 80/20 of common profile information across social networks.

With the combination of these two, most of the problem is solved.

We'll know what problems to solve next once more sites have implemented hCard+XFN and we start to take such support for granted, much as we take syndication support for granted in web sites today.

Does clientside forms autofill solve the reenter your profile problem

Does client-side forms autofill (e.g. RoboForm) solve the re-enter your profile info problem?

Yes, clientside tools can help with the initial form filling out.

However, what happens when:

... then you have to go browse 20+ sites and update them all one by one!

If instead those sites supported social network portability and subscribed to your syndicated hCard profile (either from some other social network, or perhaps from your blog), then you could update this info in one place, and have your profiles everywhere else automatically get the updates.

That's where you really start to see the benefits of social network portability beyond just the initial sign-up on new sites. It helps eliminate the "update tax" burden that builds with each new site you sign up on.

Does OpenID solve the re-enter your personal profile problem

Does OpenID solve the re-enter your personal profile info problem?

Does OpenID create a globally unique identifier for people

Does OpenID provide people with a way to create a globally unique identifier for themselves?

social-network-portability-faq was last modified: Tuesday, November 27th, 2007

Views