accessibility-issues - Revision history

Aaronpk: Replace with {{DISPLAYTITLE:}}

2020-07-18T16:20:45Z

Replace <entry-title> with {{DISPLAYTITLE:}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 18 July 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~<entry-title>~~accessibility issues~~</entry-title>~~		{{DISPLAYTITLE:accessibility issues}}

	These are externally raised issues about [[accessibility]] with broadly varying degrees of merit. Thus some issues may be REJECTED for a number of obvious reasons (but still documented here in case they are re-raised), and others contain longer discussions. Some issues may be ACCEPTED and perhaps cause changes or improved explanations in the spec.		These are externally raised issues about [[accessibility]] with broadly varying degrees of merit. Thus some issues may be REJECTED for a number of obvious reasons (but still documented here in case they are re-raised), and others contain longer discussions. Some issues may be ACCEPTED and perhaps cause changes or improved explanations in the spec.

Tantek: entry-title, auto-toc, closed/resolved a few past issues that have long been resolved, moved to separate pages

2011-10-26T23:41:54Z

entry-title, auto-toc, closed/resolved a few past issues that have long been resolved, moved to separate pages

Show changes

Tantek: /* Resolved Issues */ fix heading for abbr date time for links, clarify issue acceptance vs alternate rejection

2009-08-05T11:09:07Z

Resolved Issues: fix heading for abbr date time for links, clarify issue acceptance vs alternate rejection

BenWard: /* 2006-09-20 raised by Andy Mabbett in accessifyforum */

2009-05-15T22:45:33Z

2006-09-20 raised by Andy Mabbett in accessifyforum

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 15 May 2009
Line 85:		Line 85:
	====[http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6167&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 2006-09-20 raised by Andy Mabbett in accessifyforum]====		====[http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6167&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 2006-09-20 raised by Andy Mabbett in accessifyforum]====
	<div class='discussion issues'>		<div class='discussion issues'>
	*# ''Use of 'abbr' in microformats''		* ''Use of 'abbr' in microformats''
	** '''Resolved''': Previously accessibility-harmful uses of the [[abbr-design-pattern]] should now use the [[value-class-pattern]].		** '''Resolved''': Previously accessibility-harmful uses of the [[abbr-design-pattern]] should now use the [[value-class-pattern]].
	</div>		</div>

BenWard: /* Resolved Issues */ Documented resolved abbr issues.

2009-05-15T22:44:24Z

Resolved Issues: Documented resolved abbr issues.

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 == Resolved Issues ==
 Issues that are resolved but may have outstanding [[to-do]] items.
 * ...
 == Closed Issues ==

BenWard: /* Issues */ Closing abbr-design-pattern accessibility issues. YAY!

2009-05-15T22:38:00Z

Issues: Closing abbr-design-pattern accessibility issues. YAY!

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 *{{OpenIssue}} 2006-12-11 raised by Andy Mabbett
 *# ''The image in [[hcalendar-brainstorming#Photos and other attachments]] has inappropriate alt text, being just the file mname. [[User:AndyMabbett|Andy Mabbett]] 15:23, 6 Mar 2007 (PST)''
 === include-design-pattern ===

Brian: Reverted edits by DomtrCarob (Talk) to last version by RyanKing

2009-01-03T19:16:03Z

Reverted edits by DomtrCarob (Talk) to last version by RyanKing

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 3 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~eltdronelttr~~
	<h1>accessibility issues</h1>		<h1>accessibility issues</h1>

Line 6:		Line 5:
	<!-- '''IMPORTANT''': Please read the [[accessibility-faq\|accessibility FAQ]] ''before'' giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered. -->		<!-- '''IMPORTANT''': Please read the [[accessibility-faq\|accessibility FAQ]] ''before'' giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered. -->

	Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. ~~â~~ [http://tantek.com/ Tantek]		Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — [http://tantek.com/ Tantek]

	Please add new issues to the '''top''' of the list. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.		Please add new issues to the '''top''' of the list. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.
Line 88:		Line 87:
	*2006-11-26 raised by Andy Mabbett		*2006-11-26 raised by Andy Mabbett
	*# ''Using emboldening and italics to differentiate types on, e.g. the cheatsheet pages [[hcard-cheatsheet]], is unhelpful to users of assistive technologies, text-only devices, etc. A number, letter or symbol should additionally be used. [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 14:33, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)''		*# ''Using emboldening and italics to differentiate types on, e.g. the cheatsheet pages [[hcard-cheatsheet]], is unhelpful to users of assistive technologies, text-only devices, etc. A number, letter or symbol should additionally be used. [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 14:33, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)''
	#I think the emboldening is fine as it marks up the required properties. The italics are a bit of a problem but keep it simple at the moment. Additional characters ~~canât~~ be used as they would break the class="property" template. Colors would be a way but are inaccessible to some users, so there is no real solution to that problem for now. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:55, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#I think the emboldening is fine as it marks up the required properties. The italics are a bit of a problem but keep it simple at the moment. Additional characters can’t be used as they would break the class="property" template. Colors would be a way but are inaccessible to some users, so there is no real solution to that problem for now. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:55, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#*"I think the emboldening is fine" - how would you understand emboldening in a text-only browser like Lynx, or in an aural browser? [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 15:17, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)		#*"I think the emboldening is fine" - how would you understand emboldening in a text-only browser like Lynx, or in an aural browser? [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 15:17, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)
	#**Ups, I just assumed that it would use strong and em tags. Yeah, well, ~~letâs~~ think about it. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 23:22, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#**Ups, I just assumed that it would use strong and em tags. Yeah, well, let’s think about it. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 23:22, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#Of course, one could add that stuff ''after'' the class="property" thing. That might look a little cluttered though. ~~Iâll~~ consider that for the next revision/next cheat sheet I do. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:57, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#Of course, one could add that stuff ''after'' the class="property" thing. That might look a little cluttered though. I’ll consider that for the next revision/next cheat sheet I do. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:57, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#*All that's needed is:		#*All that's needed is:
	::::<nowiki>* class="vcard" (1)</nowiki>		::::<nowiki>* class="vcard" (1)</nowiki>

DomtrCarob: alpasrolac

2009-01-03T11:28:27Z

alpasrolac

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 3 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			eltdronelttr
	<h1>accessibility issues</h1>		<h1>accessibility issues</h1>

Line 5:		Line 6:
	<!-- '''IMPORTANT''': Please read the [[accessibility-faq\|accessibility FAQ]] ''before'' giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered. -->		<!-- '''IMPORTANT''': Please read the [[accessibility-faq\|accessibility FAQ]] ''before'' giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered. -->

	Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — [http://tantek.com/ Tantek]		Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. â [http://tantek.com/ Tantek]

	Please add new issues to the '''top''' of the list. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.		Please add new issues to the '''top''' of the list. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.
Line 87:		Line 88:
	*2006-11-26 raised by Andy Mabbett		*2006-11-26 raised by Andy Mabbett
	*# ''Using emboldening and italics to differentiate types on, e.g. the cheatsheet pages [[hcard-cheatsheet]], is unhelpful to users of assistive technologies, text-only devices, etc. A number, letter or symbol should additionally be used. [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 14:33, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)''		*# ''Using emboldening and italics to differentiate types on, e.g. the cheatsheet pages [[hcard-cheatsheet]], is unhelpful to users of assistive technologies, text-only devices, etc. A number, letter or symbol should additionally be used. [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 14:33, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)''
	#I think the emboldening is fine as it marks up the required properties. The italics are a bit of a problem but keep it simple at the moment. Additional characters ~~can’t~~ be used as they would break the class="property" template. Colors would be a way but are inaccessible to some users, so there is no real solution to that problem for now. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:55, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#I think the emboldening is fine as it marks up the required properties. The italics are a bit of a problem but keep it simple at the moment. Additional characters canât be used as they would break the class="property" template. Colors would be a way but are inaccessible to some users, so there is no real solution to that problem for now. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:55, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#*"I think the emboldening is fine" - how would you understand emboldening in a text-only browser like Lynx, or in an aural browser? [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 15:17, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)		#*"I think the emboldening is fine" - how would you understand emboldening in a text-only browser like Lynx, or in an aural browser? [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 15:17, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)
	#**Ups, I just assumed that it would use strong and em tags. Yeah, well, ~~let’s~~ think about it. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 23:22, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#**Ups, I just assumed that it would use strong and em tags. Yeah, well, letâs think about it. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 23:22, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#Of course, one could add that stuff ''after'' the class="property" thing. That might look a little cluttered though. ~~I’ll~~ consider that for the next revision/next cheat sheet I do. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:57, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#Of course, one could add that stuff ''after'' the class="property" thing. That might look a little cluttered though. Iâll consider that for the next revision/next cheat sheet I do. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:57, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#*All that's needed is:		#*All that's needed is:
	::::<nowiki>* class="vcard" (1)</nowiki>		::::<nowiki>* class="vcard" (1)</nowiki>

RyanKing: Reverted edits by Racc4Tcnam (Talk) to last version by AmeerDawood

2008-12-17T23:51:17Z

Reverted edits by Racc4Tcnam (Talk) to last version by AmeerDawood

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 17 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~zeloucn~~
	<h1>accessibility issues</h1>		<h1>accessibility issues</h1>

Line 6:		Line 5:
	<!-- '''IMPORTANT''': Please read the [[accessibility-faq\|accessibility FAQ]] ''before'' giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered. -->		<!-- '''IMPORTANT''': Please read the [[accessibility-faq\|accessibility FAQ]] ''before'' giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered. -->

	Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. ~~â~~ [http://tantek.com/ Tantek]		Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — [http://tantek.com/ Tantek]

	Please add new issues to the '''top''' of the list. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.		Please add new issues to the '''top''' of the list. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.
Line 88:		Line 87:
	*2006-11-26 raised by Andy Mabbett		*2006-11-26 raised by Andy Mabbett
	*# ''Using emboldening and italics to differentiate types on, e.g. the cheatsheet pages [[hcard-cheatsheet]], is unhelpful to users of assistive technologies, text-only devices, etc. A number, letter or symbol should additionally be used. [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 14:33, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)''		*# ''Using emboldening and italics to differentiate types on, e.g. the cheatsheet pages [[hcard-cheatsheet]], is unhelpful to users of assistive technologies, text-only devices, etc. A number, letter or symbol should additionally be used. [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 14:33, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)''
	#I think the emboldening is fine as it marks up the required properties. The italics are a bit of a problem but keep it simple at the moment. Additional characters ~~canât~~ be used as they would break the class="property" template. Colors would be a way but are inaccessible to some users, so there is no real solution to that problem for now. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:55, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#I think the emboldening is fine as it marks up the required properties. The italics are a bit of a problem but keep it simple at the moment. Additional characters can’t be used as they would break the class="property" template. Colors would be a way but are inaccessible to some users, so there is no real solution to that problem for now. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:55, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#*"I think the emboldening is fine" - how would you understand emboldening in a text-only browser like Lynx, or in an aural browser? [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 15:17, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)		#*"I think the emboldening is fine" - how would you understand emboldening in a text-only browser like Lynx, or in an aural browser? [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 15:17, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)
	#**Ups, I just assumed that it would use strong and em tags. Yeah, well, ~~letâs~~ think about it. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 23:22, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#**Ups, I just assumed that it would use strong and em tags. Yeah, well, let’s think about it. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 23:22, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#Of course, one could add that stuff ''after'' the class="property" thing. That might look a little cluttered though. ~~Iâll~~ consider that for the next revision/next cheat sheet I do. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:57, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#Of course, one could add that stuff ''after'' the class="property" thing. That might look a little cluttered though. I’ll consider that for the next revision/next cheat sheet I do. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:57, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#*All that's needed is:		#*All that's needed is:
	::::<nowiki>* class="vcard" (1)</nowiki>		::::<nowiki>* class="vcard" (1)</nowiki>

Racc4Tcnam: trdronernoer

2008-12-17T20:16:27Z

trdronernoer

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 17 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			zeloucn
	<h1>accessibility issues</h1>		<h1>accessibility issues</h1>

Line 5:		Line 6:
	<!-- '''IMPORTANT''': Please read the [[accessibility-faq\|accessibility FAQ]] ''before'' giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered. -->		<!-- '''IMPORTANT''': Please read the [[accessibility-faq\|accessibility FAQ]] ''before'' giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered. -->

	Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — [http://tantek.com/ Tantek]		Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. â [http://tantek.com/ Tantek]

	Please add new issues to the '''top''' of the list. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.		Please add new issues to the '''top''' of the list. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.
Line 87:		Line 88:
	*2006-11-26 raised by Andy Mabbett		*2006-11-26 raised by Andy Mabbett
	*# ''Using emboldening and italics to differentiate types on, e.g. the cheatsheet pages [[hcard-cheatsheet]], is unhelpful to users of assistive technologies, text-only devices, etc. A number, letter or symbol should additionally be used. [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 14:33, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)''		*# ''Using emboldening and italics to differentiate types on, e.g. the cheatsheet pages [[hcard-cheatsheet]], is unhelpful to users of assistive technologies, text-only devices, etc. A number, letter or symbol should additionally be used. [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 14:33, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)''
	#I think the emboldening is fine as it marks up the required properties. The italics are a bit of a problem but keep it simple at the moment. Additional characters ~~can’t~~ be used as they would break the class="property" template. Colors would be a way but are inaccessible to some users, so there is no real solution to that problem for now. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:55, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#I think the emboldening is fine as it marks up the required properties. The italics are a bit of a problem but keep it simple at the moment. Additional characters canât be used as they would break the class="property" template. Colors would be a way but are inaccessible to some users, so there is no real solution to that problem for now. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:55, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#*"I think the emboldening is fine" - how would you understand emboldening in a text-only browser like Lynx, or in an aural browser? [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 15:17, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)		#*"I think the emboldening is fine" - how would you understand emboldening in a text-only browser like Lynx, or in an aural browser? [[User:AndyMabbett\|Andy Mabbett]] 15:17, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)
	#**Ups, I just assumed that it would use strong and em tags. Yeah, well, ~~let’s~~ think about it. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 23:22, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#**Ups, I just assumed that it would use strong and em tags. Yeah, well, letâs think about it. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 23:22, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#Of course, one could add that stuff ''after'' the class="property" thing. That might look a little cluttered though. ~~I’ll~~ consider that for the next revision/next cheat sheet I do. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:57, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)		#Of course, one could add that stuff ''after'' the class="property" thing. That might look a little cluttered though. Iâll consider that for the next revision/next cheat sheet I do. [[User:JulianStahnke\|Julian Stahnke]] 22:57, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
	#*All that's needed is:		#*All that's needed is:
	::::<nowiki>* class="vcard" (1)</nowiki>		::::<nowiki>* class="vcard" (1)</nowiki>

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, 5 August 2009
Line 62:		Line 62:
	Issues that are resolved but may have outstanding [[to-do]] items.		Issues that are resolved but may have outstanding [[to-do]] items.

	===abbr-design-pattern related issues:		===abbr-design-pattern ===
			[[abbr-design-pattern]] related issues. The issues are resolved at a specification level following the completion of the [[value-class-pattern]]. It is necessary now that examples across all impact microformat specifications be updated to reflect the new pattern where appropriate.
	~~These~~ issues are resolved at a specification level following the completion of the [[value-class-pattern]]. It is necessary now that examples across all impact microformat specifications be updated to reflect the new pattern where appropriate.

	====2008-05-21 raised by Charles Belov====		====2008-05-21 raised by Charles Belov====
	<div class='discussion issues'>		<div class='discussion issues'>
	*# ISO dates are not conceptually friendly to non-technical persons creating a web page manually.		* ISO dates are not conceptually friendly to non-technical persons creating a web page manually.
	**# An alternate encoding which I believe would be accessible would be as follows:		** An alternate encoding which I believe would be accessible would be as follows:
	<pre>Monday, May 16, 2008, 2:31pm<abbr class="dtstart"		<pre>Monday, May 16, 2008, 2:31pm<abbr class="dtstart"
	style="display:none" title="2008-05-16T14:31:00-0700"></abbr></pre>		style="display:none" title="2008-05-16T14:31:00-0700"></abbr></pre>
	[[User:CharlesBelov\|Charles Belov]] 13:35, 21 May 2008 (PDT)		[[User:CharlesBelov\|Charles Belov]] 13:35, 21 May 2008 (PDT)
	** '''~~Resolved~~''': Previously accessibility-harmful uses of the [[abbr-design-pattern]] should now use the [[value-class-pattern]]. --[[User:BenWard\|BenWard]] 22:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)		** '''ISSUE ACCEPTED, ALTERNATE REJECTED.''': Previously accessibility-harmful uses of the [[abbr-design-pattern]] should now use the [[value-class-pattern]]. --[[User:BenWard\|BenWard]] 22:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>