http://microformats.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=block-list-issues 2026-05-13T22:08:56Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.38.4 http://microformats.org/wiki/index.php?title=block-list-issues&diff=40037&oldid=prev 2009-07-30T02:28:48Z

<p>move from main block list page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Part of the effort to develop a [[block-list]] microformat.<br /> <br /> == issues ==<br /> &lt;div class=&quot;discussion&quot;&gt;<br /> *Does a block list need to represent levels of animosity? <br /> ** Most examples in the wild are binary: either someone is blocked or they aren't (unlike XFN or other buddy list taxonomies that allow for degrees of intimacy and clarity). One possibility is to allow for block-list items to be tagged to perhaps reflect a folksonomy of reasons for blocking (e.g. types of trolling), perhaps with citations to online examples of misbehaviors. - [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] 02:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)<br /> * Couldn't this be an addition to XFN then, or would it be out of scope? --[[User:AlexandreSolleiro|AlexandreSolleiro]] 16:36, 27 Oct 2007 (PDT)<br /> ** It's not clear, since XFN has a strictly positive/neutral scope, and the use-cases (and user interfaces) of friends lists and block lists are so very different. In particular, so far, the [[block-list-examples|research on block lists]] shows no taxonomy at all. Just a simple list of people that are &quot;blocked&quot;. Therefore that should perhaps be the basis of a first attempt at a microformat. - [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] 23:06, 27 Oct 2007 (PDT)<br /> &lt;/div&gt;<br /> <br /> ===template===<br /> {{issues-format}}<br /> <br /> == see also ==<br /> * [[block-list]]<br /> * [[block-list-examples]]<br /> * [[block-list-formats]]<br /> * [[block-list-brainstorming]]</div>

Tantek