vote-links-issues: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(use of 'rev' deprecated -) |
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) (use format of other issues pages) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Vote-link Issues= | |||
These are issues that people have raised regarding [[vote-links]]. If you'd like to raise an issue here, please put the date and your name and clearly state your issue. | |||
== Template == | |||
Please use this format (copy and paste this to the end of the list to add your issues): | |||
* {{OpenIssue}} YYYY-MM-DD raised by [http://yourhomepage.example.com YOURNAME]. | |||
*# ''Issue 1: Here is the first issue I have.'' | |||
*# ''Issue 2: Here is the second issue I have.'' | |||
==Issues== | ==Issues== | ||
* {{OpenIssue}} 2005-06-21 raised by Hixie | |||
*# ''Issue H-1: This specification is lacking a user agent conformance section. There's basically nothing that says how VoteLinks must be parsed, how to handle errors, and so forth. Is it defined in terms of the DOM? Is it defined in terms of a serialisation? How do you handle conflicting content? | |||
* | * {{OpenIssue}} 2006-08-23 by porneL | ||
*# '' | *# ''What is the relation of vote links and [[rel-nofollow|rel=nofollow]]? <a rev="vote-against"> may actually have positive effect on referenced page in search engines that don't understand vote links. <a rev="vote-against" rel="nofollow"> makes more sense in this case, however nofollow means that PR should not be affected, which might be in conflict with interpretation of vote-against. | ||
* | * {{OpenIssue}} 2007-01-04 by SteveIvy (originally by tantek in irc) | ||
*# '' | *# ''[[rel-faq#Should_.27rev.27_even_be_used|According to the 'rel' FAQ]], 'Use of "rev" SHOULD be avoided. However, VoteLinks, is being grandfathered since it was such an early use. No future microformats should be developed that use "rev".' Would it be useful to put vote-links through the proper process and see what comes of it? | ||
==See also== | |||
* | *[[vote-links]] | ||
Revision as of 14:50, 5 January 2007
Vote-link Issues
These are issues that people have raised regarding vote-links. If you'd like to raise an issue here, please put the date and your name and clearly state your issue.
Template
Please use this format (copy and paste this to the end of the list to add your issues):
- open issue! YYYY-MM-DD raised by YOURNAME.
- Issue 1: Here is the first issue I have.
- Issue 2: Here is the second issue I have.
Issues
- open issue! 2005-06-21 raised by Hixie
- Issue H-1: This specification is lacking a user agent conformance section. There's basically nothing that says how VoteLinks must be parsed, how to handle errors, and so forth. Is it defined in terms of the DOM? Is it defined in terms of a serialisation? How do you handle conflicting content?
- open issue! 2006-08-23 by porneL
- What is the relation of vote links and rel=nofollow? <a rev="vote-against"> may actually have positive effect on referenced page in search engines that don't understand vote links. <a rev="vote-against" rel="nofollow"> makes more sense in this case, however nofollow means that PR should not be affected, which might be in conflict with interpretation of vote-against.
- open issue! 2007-01-04 by SteveIvy (originally by tantek in irc)
- According to the 'rel' FAQ, 'Use of "rev" SHOULD be avoided. However, VoteLinks, is being grandfathered since it was such an early use. No future microformats should be developed that use "rev".' Would it be useful to put vote-links through the proper process and see what comes of it?