adr-poll: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) (General comments) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Where the <code>adr</code> has content, but no sub-properties, parsers ['''MAY | SHOULD | MUST'''] output the content of that <code>adr</code> as a single vCard ['''output-field'''] field. | Where the <code>adr</code> has content, but no valid sub-properties, parsers ['''MAY | SHOULD | MUST'''] output the content of that <code>adr</code> as a single vCard ['''output-field'''] field. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
===locality=== | ===locality=== | ||
==General comments== | |||
Revision as of 12:18, 9 April 2007
Change to adr spec
Further to discussion at hcard-brainstorming#ADR with no children, it is proposed to amend the adr spec, and the corresponding part of the hCard spec, thus:
Where the
adrhas content, but no valid sub-properties, parsers [MAY | SHOULD | MUST] output the content of thatadras a single vCard [output-field] field.
Please indicate you support or objections preferred wording and choice of output-field, below, using an asterisk and three tildes (* ~~~), followed by any comments. Please indicate your preferences, even if you object to the main proposal, so that they may still be considered if the proposal carries. You may change your votes at any time, until a community decision is made.
Main proposal
Support
Object
(please give reasons)