well-known-locations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(drafted because google searching for well known locations currently sucks to find these references.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Well known locations on websites are a bad idea = | |||
In other words, the convention of "/robots.txt" and certainly "/favicon.ico" were ''mistakes''. | In other words, the convention of "/robots.txt" and certainly "/favicon.ico" were ''mistakes''. |
Revision as of 19:03, 23 April 2007
Well known locations on websites are a bad idea
In other words, the convention of "/robots.txt" and certainly "/favicon.ico" were mistakes.
The W3C TAG has discussed and resolved this issue.
See:
- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0093.html from Tim Berners-Lee
- Stop reading when you get to "Example solution for feasability" and "A new http tag such as "Metadata:" is introduced".