genealogy-brainstorming: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) (→Relationships: primary relationships are most commonly published) |
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) m (related-pages template) |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{genealogy-related-pages}} | |||
Revision as of 10:06, 27 September 2007
Genealogy Brainstorming
Contributors
Gender
To make life easier for publishers, the following values should all equate, without requiring the use of abbr
to:
Male
- male
- he
- man
- m
- son
- father
- husband
- brother
- uncle
- nephew
- grandfather/ grand-father / great-grand-father etc.
- grandson/ grand-son / great-grand-son etc.
- ...
Female
- female
- she
- woman
- f
- fem
- wife
- daughter
- mother
- sister
- aunt
- niece
- grandmother/ grand-mother / great-grand-mother etc.
- granddaughter/ grand-daughter / great-grand-daughter etc.
- ...
Issue
- What about other languages?
- See: internationalisation
- Gender reassignment and other edge cases
- Outside the 80/20 cut-off
- Could use
abbr
Relationships
Additional XFN rel
values may be required (e.g. "uncle"; see above for further examples).
From existing publishing practices, it seems likely that primary relationships ("mother", "father", "son", "daughter", "brother", "sister", "husband", "wife"; or perhaps the gender-neutral "parent", "child", "sibling", "spouse") are more commonly expressed when linking from one page to another; though non-marriage partnerships and short-term liaisons should also be catered for.
See also
- genealogy - overview of genealogy microformat effort
- genealogy-examples - research and documentation of existing real world genealogy publishing examples on the web
- genealogy-formats - research and documentation of previous genealogy related formats
- genealogy-brainstorming - brainstorm proposals for a genealogy microformat