breadcrumbs-formats: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kevin Marks (talk | contribs) (→add more formats: schema.org) |
(give other breadcrumb formats their own sections, group/note sitemap formats as related and possibly worth moving to their own page) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Bing breadcrumbs format: http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/hh207240.aspx | Bing breadcrumbs format: http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/hh207240.aspx | ||
== Google rich snippet breadcrumbs == | |||
* Google Rich Snippets [http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=185417 have a 'breadcrumbs' construct], as does its [http://schema.org/WebPage|schema.org successor] | |||
== schemaorg WebPage == | |||
* schema.org [http://schema.org/WebPage WebPage] specifies <code>breadcrumb</code> as 'Text A set of links that can help a user understand and navigate a website hierarchy.' Which is an odd way to specify links. | |||
== add more formats == | == add more formats == | ||
* copy paste this subsection to add more formats. | |||
== sitemap formats == | |||
This might be worth moving to [[sitemap-formats]] and just linking to as "related", as sitemaps have overlap with, are similar to (and can inform) breadcrumbs, but they're certainly not the same thing. | |||
''This strays more into sitemaps and topic description; related themes...'' | ''This strays more into sitemaps and topic description; related themes...'' | ||
| Line 15: | Line 25: | ||
* ILRT / University of Bristol had a server-based implementation of the same format (now code-rotted), and experiments with alternatives that instead used more HTML concepts: see [http://web.archive.org/web/20000815090823/http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/discovery/rdf-dev/purls/papers/sitemap/ 1999 draft spec] | * ILRT / University of Bristol had a server-based implementation of the same format (now code-rotted), and experiments with alternatives that instead used more HTML concepts: see [http://web.archive.org/web/20000815090823/http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/discovery/rdf-dev/purls/papers/sitemap/ 1999 draft spec] | ||
* more recent work around RDF has focussed on describing hierarchies of topics using the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Knowledge_Organization_System SKOS vocabulary]; this has gained significant traction in the library community, and many thesauri are shared using SKOS. However it is not widely used to annotate in-page topic hierarchies. See [http://ckan.net/tag/format-skos CKAN list of datasets using SKOS]. | * more recent work around RDF has focussed on describing hierarchies of topics using the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Knowledge_Organization_System SKOS vocabulary]; this has gained significant traction in the library community, and many thesauri are shared using SKOS. However it is not widely used to annotate in-page topic hierarchies. See [http://ckan.net/tag/format-skos CKAN list of datasets using SKOS]. | ||
== related == | == related == | ||
Revision as of 15:15, 23 September 2011
This article is a stub. You can help the microformats.org wiki by expanding it.
This page is a collection of research regarding previous breadcrumbs formats towards the development of a breadcrumbs vocabulary and microformat per the process.
Bing breadcrumbs
Bing breadcrumbs format: http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/hh207240.aspx
Google rich snippet breadcrumbs
- Google Rich Snippets have a 'breadcrumbs' construct, as does its successor
schemaorg WebPage
- schema.org WebPage specifies
breadcrumbas 'Text A set of links that can help a user understand and navigate a website hierarchy.' Which is an odd way to specify links.
add more formats
- copy paste this subsection to add more formats.
sitemap formats
This might be worth moving to sitemap-formats and just linking to as "related", as sitemaps have overlap with, are similar to (and can inform) breadcrumbs, but they're certainly not the same thing.
This strays more into sitemaps and topic description; related themes...
- Late-90s Mozilla/Netscape browser had built-in understanding of a sitemaps format expressed in RDF. Technical details are likely buried in Mozilla CVS; some press releases still survive. The vocabulary encoded a sitemap as a graph structure, using a 'child' property to represent hierarchy, as in other areas of Mozilla (e.g. see Mozilla docs, mail/news).
- Mozilla's RDF sitemaps were preceded by Meta Content Format (MCF) sitemaps (Netscape took MCF from Apple ~1997). MCF sitemaps described a site hierarchy using a network of linked text files that summarised the site structure. MCF was an ancestor of both RSS and RDF.
- ILRT / University of Bristol had a server-based implementation of the same format (now code-rotted), and experiments with alternatives that instead used more HTML concepts: see 1999 draft spec
- more recent work around RDF has focussed on describing hierarchies of topics using the SKOS vocabulary; this has gained significant traction in the library community, and many thesauri are shared using SKOS. However it is not widely used to annotate in-page topic hierarchies. See CKAN list of datasets using SKOS.