microformats2-issues: Difference between revisions

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(dfnish, sections)
(add value, html as reserved terms)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


== Issues ==
== Issues ==
=== Reserve historically overloaded terms ===
2015-10-21 raised by [[User:Tantek|Tantek]]
microformats2 should reserve historically overloaded generic terms to discourage vocabulary designers from shooting themselves in the foot in terms of overloading, ambiguity, implied specificity, etc. E.g. these property names should be reserved:
* 'type'
* 'id'
* 'value' - already has special meaning e.g. [[vcp]]
* 'html'
* ... any other suggestions?
Thoughts?
<div class="discussion">
* ...
</div>
=== RFC2119 ===
2015-03-09:
* Normatively reference RFC2119 in microformats2 specs, based on IRC discussion [http://logs.glob.uno/?c=freenode%23microformats&s=today#c78043]
* Normatively reference RFC2119 in microformats2 specs, based on IRC discussion [http://logs.glob.uno/?c=freenode%23microformats&s=today#c78043]
** in [[microformats2]]
** in [[microformats2-parsing]]
** in microformats2 vocabularies (if necessary), e.g. [[h-card]], [[h-entry]], [[h-event]], etc.
Thoughts?
<div class="discussion">
* +1 [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] seems reasonable.
* ...
</div>


== See Also ==
== See Also ==

Latest revision as of 19:55, 21 October 2015

This article is a stub. You can help the microformats.org wiki by expanding it.

Issues relating to the overall definition of microformats2.

For parsing issues in particular, see microformats2-parsing-issues

Issues

Reserve historically overloaded terms

2015-10-21 raised by Tantek microformats2 should reserve historically overloaded generic terms to discourage vocabulary designers from shooting themselves in the foot in terms of overloading, ambiguity, implied specificity, etc. E.g. these property names should be reserved:

  • 'type'
  • 'id'
  • 'value' - already has special meaning e.g. vcp
  • 'html'
  • ... any other suggestions?

Thoughts?

  • ...

RFC2119

2015-03-09:

Thoughts?

  • +1 Tantek seems reasonable.
  • ...

See Also