accessibility: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) (See also) |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::::<nowiki>* class="vcard"</nowiki> | ::::<nowiki>* class="vcard"</nowiki> | ||
:::[[User:AndyMabbett|Andy Mabbett]] 15:24, 26 Nov 2006 (PST) | :::[[User:AndyMabbett|Andy Mabbett]] 15:24, 26 Nov 2006 (PST) | ||
==See also== | |||
[[microformats-issues]] |
Revision as of 13:22, 4 December 2006
Accessibility
This page is for keeping track of issues relating to microformats and accessibility, in the hopes that any potential accessibility issues are resolved quickly, and for documenting techniques for making microformats more accessible.
External discussions
Mailing lists
- Microformats and Semantic Structure (part 2) - 2006-10-11 in w3c-wai-ig.
- hCard and hCalendar Formats - 2006-08-03 in w3c-wai-ig.
Fora
- Use of 'abbr' in microformats - 2006-09-20. Issues: use of 'abbr'
Accessibility of this wiki
- Large blocks of italic text are inaccessible to many readers, including people with types of visual impairment, dyslexia, etc. [1], [2]. [3], [4], [5] Andy Mabbett 14:33, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)
- Using emboldening and italics to differentiate types on, e.g. the cheatsheet pages hcard-cheatsheet, is unhelpful to users of assistive technologies, text-only devices, etc. A number, letter or symbol should additionally be used. Andy Mabbett 14:33, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)
- I think the emboldening is fine as it marks up the required properties. The italics are a bit of a problem but keep it simple at the moment. Additional characters can’t be used as they would break the class="property" template. Colours would be a way but are inaccessible to some users, so there is no real solution to that problem for now. Julian Stahnke 22:55, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
- "I think the emboldening is fine" - how would you understand emboldening in a text-only browser like Lynx, or in an aural browser? Andy Mabbett 15:17, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)
- Ups, I just assumed that it would use strong and em tags. Yeah, well, let’s think about it. Julian Stahnke 23:22, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
- "I think the emboldening is fine" - how would you understand emboldening in a text-only browser like Lynx, or in an aural browser? Andy Mabbett 15:17, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)
- Of course, one could add that stuff after the class="property" thing. That might look a little cluttered though. I’ll consider that for the next revision/next cheat sheet I do. Julian Stahnke 22:57, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
- All that's needed is:
- I think the emboldening is fine as it marks up the required properties. The italics are a bit of a problem but keep it simple at the moment. Additional characters can’t be used as they would break the class="property" template. Colours would be a way but are inaccessible to some users, so there is no real solution to that problem for now. Julian Stahnke 22:55, 26 Nov 2006 (GMT)
- * class="vcard" (1)
- instead of:
- * class="vcard"
- Andy Mabbett 15:24, 26 Nov 2006 (PST)