thoughts-on-extending-the-geo-microformat

4d: A geo microformat replacement proposal

A wiki white paper by DimitriosZachariadis 17:03, 17 Jan 2007 (PST)

The term 4d stands for four dimensions and is used interchangeably with spacetime in this page, as heaving the same meaning. When in bold, it means the proposed microformat 4d.

Page under construction

Abstract

A compact microformat for defining locations and events is proposed, as a replacement for the draft geo microformat. A tolerant five part, semicolon separated, spacetime and reference-system value, is argued to be sufficient to provide accurate information for uniquely identifying a place or an event in a four dimensional universe.

 

Introduction

Spacetimes are the arenas in which all physical events take place — for example, the motion of planets around the Sun may be described in a particular type of spacetime, or the motion of light around a rotating star may be described in another type of spacetime. The basic elements of spacetime are events. In any given spacetime, an event is a unique position at a unique time. Examples of events include the explosion of a star or the single beat of a drum.Spacetime, Wikipedia (annotation by the author)

 

LOCATION and geo referencing microformats proposed on this site, namely geo, luna and mars have at present (Jan 2007) a status of draft. Dealing with the issue of geo tagging requires a consensus on the issues of importance, if the microformat is to be successful and adopted by users on a global basis. To that extend, a proposal for a new microformat might not be superfluous, if it can present and offer for discussion some of the issues in hand. With that ambition, the 4d microformat is presented and discussed herein.

Brief discussion

Most of the location related information, whether about the Earth or another celestial body, have a time related aspect attached; historical places and events, geographical features, but also street names and addresses are tightly related to an act or an observation made at some point in time; addresses used today may have not been in use a century ago (assuming the place identified by the coordinates did exist), or may well change to something different tomorrow. Landmarks existing for centuries have an age, which means they have a birthday, but they may also one day disappear.

A vast amount of information used by people on a daily basis in the web is in fact an aggregation of events; stories and descriptions are most of the time nothing more than annotations of events. As such, most of this information can be accurately tagged, stored and used for as long as it exists, if its spacetime dimensions are known.

Ambiguities and default values

Disambiguation of the values used for tagging is a very important issue, if the data tagged are to be valid, accurate and and useful outside the assumptions made at the time of their creation.

Omitting dimensions from a 4d coordinate system introduces assumptions about their default values. To demonstrate the issues that need to be dealt with, the following example of a markup, tagged with the geo microformat, might prove useful:

In 1687, a Turkish ammunition dump 

<a class="geo" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.971508,23.72658&ie=UTF8&z=18&ll=37.971508,23.72658
&spn=0.002584,0.006083&t=k&om=1&iwloc=addr">
inside the building
 <abbr class="latitude" title="37.971508"></abbr>, 
 <abbr class="longitude" title="23.72658"></abbr>
</a> 

was ignited by a Venetian cannonball. The resulting explosion severely damaged 
the Parthenon and its sculptures.

which may be rendered as:

In 1687, a Turkish ammunition dump inside the building was ignited by a Venetian cannonball. The resulting explosion severely damaged the Parthenon and its sculptures. Wikipedia, The Parthenon

In the case of the markup above, a human reader would assume that the coordinates involved in the code have been taken using WGS86, the most known and used datum today, due to its global validity and the proliferation of the GPS receivers. The ambiguity of altitude leads to an assumption of a default value of 0, which is acceptable for 2D cartography. No assumption can be made about time.

Verbosity

If the geo portion of the above markup is reduced to:

<a class="geo" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.971508,23.72658&ie=UTF8&z=18&ll=37.971508,23.72658
&spn=0.002584,0.006083&t=k&om=1&iwloc=addr">
inside the building
 <abbr class="latitude" title="37.971508"></abbr>, 
</a> 

the markup becomes useless for identifying locations, since it no more represents a location (but rather a geometric locus). If this is the case, then it seems that there is no point in having latitude and longitude defined by separate tags; indeed, the meaning of a coordinate is that it is an ordered list of numbers, or a tuple. Wikipedia, Coordinates. RFC2426[2] also specifies the GEO type as a single lat;long entity.

It could be argued that having a simpler, albeit verbose, format, helps content formating tools like XSLT processors, locate data easier. However, Microformats are a way of adding simple markup to human-readable data items such as events, contact details or locations, on web pages, so that the information in them can be extracted by software and indexed, searched for, saved, cross-referenced or combined. Microformats are not meant to help format content for humans, but to help machines gather information in a Semantic Web. On the other hand, a machine can split the data of a 4d tag in a single line of code.

Time

As argued above, the inclusion of a time dimension in geo markup can add significantly to the semantics of a piece of geo information, as it moves the focus of geo tagging from the realm of two dimensional cartography to the realm of events.

This should come as no surprise: events are about stories; cartography is about navigation. People are interested in stories, news and events; few people can successfully navigate using a map and even fewer are interested in navigation and cartography as a science or art. Geographic coordinates shown in the text are quite useless without a map, and are even more useless if an electronic map is available for use. Humans use names to identify places, not numbers. The reason there is a need for showing geographic coordinates in text, is mostly to help humans manually identify places on maps. If this can be done electronically, then numbers don't seem to matter.

A human visiting the page with the markup above (which was chosen for the length of the time dimension and the connotations involved), will have a chance to read the text (and the year of the event, which however is un-tagged), click at the link and get a Google Map centered at the Acropolis and the Parthenon. Semantic connotations for humans enhance their understanding of information presented to them.[1] However, a machine seeking information in the Semantic Web, will have no way of finding out if it is the 5th century BC Athenian state or the contemporary Greek state that this particular piece of information is referring to. Semantic information about that particular markup that could otherwise be cataloged by the machine, will pass unnoticed.

Had this geo markup been amended with a time dimension, a robot crawling this and other similar pages could create a list of historical events, based on nothing else but the information provided by the geo microformat.

Humans have learned to deal with time efficiently, in their locality, through the use of clocks. Wrist watches remind people of upcoming events in their lives. An event in a remote place is more difficult to conceive, but not entirely impossible. Although it involves a simple addition or subtraction, only people traveling a lot can do it with ease.

Counting time in multiple reference systems is however a difficult task. It might not be necessary for humans in their daily life, but it is important when dealing with information on a global, or universal basis. Different cultures, use different reference systems to tell the time. Islamic calendar These need to be taken into account in a Semantic Web.

In a similar manner, trying to addapt to a Martian reference system, while living on Earth, involves more than a simple addition/subtraction of a few hours. A Martian day, is not of the same duration as a Terran day, and the same is true for the duration of the seasons; a number of connotations, that would otherwise help get a gut feeling, fail helplessly.

The reference system

It should be noted that the assumption about the datum used in expressing the lat-long coordinates mentioned above, is not a trivial one: Only 20 years ago, the same coordinates would possibly point hundreds of meters away from the Parthenon, since the reference system used at that time was different than WGS84. Furthermore, assuming WGS84 was the datum for the markup above, these coordinates may not be accurate 10 years from today, when the WGS84 reference system will have been revised once again.

A markable indication of the importance of the reference system, when expressing geo coordinates, is the fact that the Greenwich Observatory, which was by definition the origin for the longitude coordinate for more than a century, lies now about 102.5m West of the WGS84 0.0 meridian, at N 51° 28' 36.71, W 0° 0' 5.18", (in WGS84 datum) according to Wikipedia, Prime_Meridian. Interestingly, Google maps and Wikipedia do not seem to agree on these coordinates map

It should be clear that, for a microformat to be able to convey accurate information, well defined and known reference systems should be used. By performing transformations among the various reference systems, the content referenced in one system can be understandable and usefull on another, on a global or universal basis.

Name convention

Naming a geo microformat 4d helps avoid the problem of the geo-centric (i.e. Earth bound) root of the word geo; 4d can be easily used on any celestial body for which a reference system, even rudimentary, has been defined. To that extend, Moon (Luna) or Mars related content can be readily microformatted and displayed on Google Moon and Google Mars. Obviously, matters regarding reference systems of other celestial bodies require expert knowledge, however, reading the news on NASA's site, e.g. for Titan, Two Sides of Dunes, reveals that reference systems are in place for all celestial bodies visited by a man made spacecraft, and probably for a lot more than those.

4d is a rather common acronym; Google yields about 53.9 million hits, while for 3d it yields 310 million hits and for geo 82.9 million.

Specification

Under construction

Notes

1. Umberto Eco, A Theory of Semiotics, 1976
2. RFC2426

Further discussion

Pages for discussing of this proposal:

• 4d brainstorming