profile-uris: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) (Profile examples, in the wild) |
(un-resolve and clarify the combined profile issue) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* what about versioning? how to keep in sync with the wiki and test materials? | * what about versioning? how to keep in sync with the wiki and test materials? | ||
* what profile URI to use for combinations, such as [[hcard]] and [[hcalendar]]? | * what profile URI to use for combinations, such as [[hcard]] and [[hcalendar]]? | ||
** | ** note [http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#adef-profile HTML4.01] states "that one or more meta data profiles, [are] separated by white space." Though it's simpler for authors if they can just use one profile URI. | ||
* More profiles are needed. | * More profiles are needed. | ||
Revision as of 20:37, 28 February 2007
In hcalendar-issues, it is ACCEPTED that each microformat should have a profile URI, like [the XFN profile].
Some issues include:
- what domain to use? Candidates include:
- microformats.org
- www.w3.org
- xmdp.org
- what about versioning? how to keep in sync with the wiki and test materials?
- what profile URI to use for combinations, such as hcard and hcalendar?
- note HTML4.01 states "that one or more meta data profiles, [are] separated by white space." Though it's simpler for authors if they can just use one profile URI.
- More profiles are needed.
One proposal is: use www.w3.org, following W3C namespace policy. As to versioning, change the profile whenever the wiki changes (within some reasonable latency, say, a couple weeks or a month). For example: an hCard Profile at w3.org, and discussion: an hCard profile that seems to work with GRDDL.
See also:
- Profile examples, in the wild
- faqs-for-rdf for discussion of connecting microformats to URIs.
- hcard-profile.