include-pattern-feedback: Difference between revisions
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) m (→Proprietary attribute: strike out fixed bug) |
|||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
* 31 dash include | * 31 dash include | ||
Was keyboard access fully tested (see above)? This test is not conclusive, as JAWS 7.0's behaviour may well differ from other access technology. Further testing with a wider range of readers is strongly recommended. -- [[User:PatrickLauke|Patrick H. Lauke]] 28 Apr 2007 | Was keyboard access fully tested (see above)? This test is not conclusive, as JAWS 7.0's behaviour may well differ from other access technology. Further testing with a wider range of readers is strongly recommended. -- [[User:PatrickLauke|Patrick H. Lauke]] 28 Apr 2007 | ||
The example above has been incorrectly stated, to be honest. Conclusion was just a conclusion for that verbal test, not overall. Therefore, removed "Conclusion" line so it's not misleading! I concur with additional tests are vital (by as many people/softwares/scenarios as possible!). [[User:Phae|Phae]] 04:10, 2 May 2007 (PDT) | |||
=== Proprietary attribute === | === Proprietary attribute === |
Revision as of 11:10, 2 May 2007
Include Pattern Feedback
Feedback about include-pattern.
Objects and Browser Behavior
Over at Yahoo! Local, we were using the object include pattern for all our hReviews on business detail pages and review listings. That is, until we realized that Safari and Internet Explorer both try to embed the entire page with every OBJECT call. (Firefox correctly recognizes that it's a local object and doesn't reload anything.)
On a page with 20+ reviews, this means a substantial increase in load time and memory consumption. As a result of this (bad) browser behavior, we removed the objects entirely.
Any suggestions for workarounds or modifications to the pattern?
-- AndyBaio 29 Jun 2006
Can you use the hyperlink option with DHMTL/Ajax to perform replacements in advanced browsers? (Simon Willison's getElementsBySelector()
may be helpful)
<a href="#id" class="include" title=""></a>
with something like:
//Works only for linked include-pattern definition at microformats.org //Requires Simon Willison's getElementsBySelector() // and normal IE workaround for addEventListener() addEventListener( window, 'load', function() { var myIncludes = document.getElementsBySelector( 'a[href].include' ), a, e; for( var i=0; a=myIncludes[i]; i++ ) if (a.href.charAt(0)=='#') { e = document.getElementsBySelector( a.href )[0].cloneNode( true ); a.parentNode.replaceChild( e, a ); } })
--RichHall 00:51, 23 Oct 2006 (PDT)
It seems there is some confusion around this topic. I believe that the included data are not supposed to be actually included in the point of inclusion. I believe it is only meant to be a hint for the microformats parser; but the inclusion pattern should not affect how the page is rendered. If that is true, let's clear out this page:
- Remove the DHTML suggestion by Rich Hall.
- Change the IRC quote between Tantek and Kaply. Replace the quote "clone the dom node from the other vcard and replace the object with the corresponding nodes" with "look for objects in the vcard and check their corresponding nodes in the dom" of 2007-01-03 or remove the IRC quote completely.
-- User:JiriKopsa 18 Mar 2007
My hResume page seen here caused Safari 2.0 some major issues. The page was jumping between object elements when a link was hovered eventually causing the browser to crash. You can follow the thread on the WSG mail archive.
It seems that while the object element may be more semantically appropriate it is not may not be usable in lieu of the issues raised in Safari.
--Robert O'Rourke 12:08, 3 Nov 2006 (PST)
Which version of Safari? Please be specific as many Safari OBJECT bugs were fixed in Safari 2.x.
-- Tantek 13:39, 3 Nov 2006 (PST)
The issues with OBJECT in Internet Explorer & Safari and the lack of a good workaround example are a show stopper for me using this. I am now commenting it out. Hope someone can think of a workaround!
--Jon Williams 10:21, 7 Feb 2007 (PST)
Hyperlink Include - issues for keyboard users (including Screen Reader users)
Although invisible in visual user agents, and (according to the JAWS 7.0 test below) not spoken by screen readers (at least not by JAWS 7.0), empty links are still contained in the normal tab cycle. Users navigating via keyboard (or equivalent, e.g. switch access, puff/blow devices, etc) will still need to tab through the empty links (tested in Firefox 2.0, IE 6, IE 7; Opera 9.2 seems to remove empty links from tab cycle).
This can be verified by modifying the test page below, adding a regular link at the end of the 5 variations of empty links. It takes a user 6 tabs to arrive at the "real" link. It would therefore be advisable to rethink the approach, or scrap it completely.
-- Patrick H. Lauke 28 Apr 2007
Hyperlink Include - Screen Reader Testing
Some concerns have been raised over the implications using empty hyperlinks may have on assistive devices such as screen readers. One concern is that an empty link may be read out, partially read out or result in some other confusing scenario for the user.
In response, a test page consisting of a number of empty hyperlinks in the style suggested by the pattern has been created. A 'good' result is that none of the links be read out.
Test Results: JAWS 7.0 with Firefox 1.5/Win
Tested by Frances Berriman 2006-07-21.
- 31 dash include dash Mozilla Firefox
- Page has no links
- 31 dash include
Was keyboard access fully tested (see above)? This test is not conclusive, as JAWS 7.0's behaviour may well differ from other access technology. Further testing with a wider range of readers is strongly recommended. -- Patrick H. Lauke 28 Apr 2007
The example above has been incorrectly stated, to be honest. Conclusion was just a conclusion for that verbal test, not overall. Therefore, removed "Conclusion" line so it's not misleading! I concur with additional tests are vital (by as many people/softwares/scenarios as possible!). Phae 04:10, 2 May 2007 (PDT)
Proprietary attribute
HTML tidy on the test page gives:
- Warning: <a> proprietary attribute "data"
The W3C validator is similarly unimpressed.
AndyMabbett 14:22, 22 Oct 2006 (PDT)
Use href
To clarify, links on the test page should be changed to use the
href
attribute as described at include-pattern (without href
attributes, the elements probably won't register as hyperlinks, but anchors). Set title=""
to fix empty link behavior for many assistive devices. --RichHall 23:31, 22 Oct 2006 (PDT)
Test page corrected
2006-10-25: This error has been corrected on the test page. Any tests should probably be re-run in light of this.
Unclear status
It's not clear, either from the main Wiki page or include-pattern, whether this is an agreed standard, a draft, or just a proposal. AndyMabbett 03:14, 18 Oct 2006 (PDT)
- include-pattern is not its own proposal, draft, or spec. It is a design pattern, as listed on the wiki home page that is included in other proposals, drafts. and specs. Recommend for adding to the include-pattern-faq.
- And that is not clear, either from the main Wiki page or include-pattern. AndyMabbett 16:40, 18 Oct 2006 (PDT)
- ACCEPTED. Will further clarify relationship between patterns and formats. Tantek 16:48, 18 Oct 2006 (PDT)
- And that is not clear, either from the main Wiki page or include-pattern. AndyMabbett 16:40, 18 Oct 2006 (PDT)
Parsing for include-pattern
Note: this issue is obsolete. On a IRC conversation 2007-01-03, Mike Kaply admitted that he figured this out, which is to apply all includes first into the parse tree before looking for any properties. -Tantek
To be more specific, what finally occurred to me is that the object pattern is simply about grabbing nodes from another vcard and using them in this vcard. So the implementor responsibility is just to clone the dom node from the other vcard and replace the object with the corresponding nodes. Works great. (of course I also had to clone the entire vcard since I can't manipulate the DOM like that without changing the page) -mkaply
In an IRC discussion with Mike Kaply (author of the Operator extension for Firefox) we discussed the difficulty of parsing for an include-pattern in hResume. Mike asks:
I'm really wondering why the
object
stuff doesn't point back to the entire vCard. I don't understand why the spec has it point to individual items.
The problem was thought to be a weakness in the specification, which doesn't specify what part of the data is in the content that is pointed to by the object
.
Currently, to overcome this a parser needs to follow this logic:
- IF I don't find an
fn
, look for anobject
. IF there is anobject
, do agetelementbyid
on thatID
, but yet there was nothing about thatobject
that said that the content I was looking for in the other card was anfn
- IF I don't find an
Two things may help in overcoming this difficulty:
- Change the spec to have the include-pattern reference the entire vCard, with the intent that any data not found in this vCard use the other vCard
- Include the element of the reference, where the class attribute on
<object>
has "include" plus the element that needs to be included. For example:
<object class="include fn" data="#vcard-name">myname</object>
Additionally, I pointed out that using the <object>
element to contain the reference makes Microsoft's Internet Explorer throw an error "Your current security settings prohibit ActiveX controls on this page. As a result, the page may not display correctly." Of course, there is no ActiveX content on an include-pattern.
Bob Jonkman 21:15, 2 Jan 2007 (PST)#
Concatenating values
I feel that there should be a way to "include" data from two places, in one microformat property. For instance:
<span id="summaryA" class="summary">Kidderminster Branch Indoor Meeting</span>
<span id="summaryB>Janaury</span>
and later
<object data="#summaryB+#summaryA" class="include"></object>
would give a summary of:
- January Kidderminster Branch Indoor Meeting
It may even be possible to include extra data:
<span id="summaryC>Fred Smith</span>
<object data="#summaryA+ with +#summaryC" class="include"></object>
to give:
- Kidderminster Branch Indoor Meeting with Fred Smith
Andy Mabbett 14:33, 8 Jan 2007 (PST)
Why not use
<span class="value"><object data="#summaryA" class="include"></object> with <object data="#summaryB" class="include"></object></span>
to build
- Kidderminster Branch Indoor Meeting with Fred Smith
Derrick Pallas 11:15, 31 Jan 2007 (PST)
- Neat solution! Can anyone say whether current parsers accept this? Andy Mabbett 12:18, 31 Jan 2007 (PST)
- Fully disclosure: My XSLT transformer supports this implicitly because it does include-pattern first, then pulls values. My only question would be what to do with nested @class="value" elements that could result from this. Derrick Pallas 12:35, 31 Jan 2007 (PST)
Related Pages
- the include pattern
- include-pattern examples in the wild - an on-going list of websites which use the include pattern.
- include-pattern FAQ - if you have any questions about the include pattern, check here, and if you don't find answers, add your questions!
- include-pattern feedback- general feedback (as opposed to specific issues).
- include-pattern issues - specific issues with the include pattern.
- include-pattern strawman - alternative proposals