htodo: Difference between revisions
m (Reverted edit of Gazza, changed back to last version by RyanKing) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
As the data types for '''completed''' and '''due''' are the same as, e.g., '''dtstart''', then the usage should be the same. For example, | As the data types for '''completed''' and '''due''' are the same as, e.g., '''dtstart''', then the usage should be the same. For example, | ||
Revision as of 21:11, 8 June 2007
hToDo
This is just an initial draft
VTODO is part of the RFC2445 iCalendar spec used for describing todo items.
VTODO is fairly straight-forward, as it doesn't contain any nested entities, and has a fairly small list of properties. Most of these it shares with VEVENT, suggesting htodo be modeled on hevent in hcalendar, and the ground assumption is that htodo should work just like hevent with respect to these properties. The shared properties are:
class, created, description, dtstamp, dtstart, geo, last-mod, location, organizer, priority, recurid, seq, statusm summary, uid, url, duration, attach, attendee, categories, comment, contact, exdate, exrule, rstatus, related, resources, rdate, rrule, x-prop
The unique properties to VTODO are:
- completed The date/time the todo was completed
- due The date/time this todo is due
- percent Integer from 0-100, completion status
As the data types for completed and due are the same as, e.g., dtstart, then the usage should be the same. For example,