profile-uris: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Reverting to latest revision by DanC) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[hcalendar-issues]], it is ACCEPTED that each microformat should have a profile URI, like [[http://gmpg.org/xfn/11 the XFN profile]]. | |||
Some issues include: | Some issues include: |
Revision as of 15:51, 11 June 2007
In hcalendar-issues, it is ACCEPTED that each microformat should have a profile URI, like [the XFN profile].
Some issues include:
- what domain to use? Candidates include:
- microformats.org
- www.w3.org
- xmdp.org
- what about versioning? how to keep in sync with the wiki and test materials?
- what profile URI to use for combinations, such as hcard and hcalendar?
- note HTML4.01 states "that one or more meta data profiles, [are] separated by white space." Though it's simpler for authors if they can just use one profile URI.
- More profiles are needed.
One proposal is: use www.w3.org, following W3C namespace policy. As to versioning, change the profile whenever the wiki changes (within some reasonable latency, say, a couple weeks or a month). For example: an hCard Profile at w3.org, and discussion: an hCard profile that seems to work with GRDDL.
See also:
- Profile examples, in the wild
- faqs-for-rdf for discussion of connecting microformats to URIs.
- hcard-profile.