aggregate-review-formats: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This document is for listing existing formats for specifying aggregate review information. | This document is for listing existing formats for specifying aggregate review information. | ||
So far, no formats have been found. However, some existing formats for reviews in general are available on the [[review-examples|review examples]] page. | |||
Sites that attempt to aggregate reviews from many sources: | |||
* Metacritic: Metacritic aggregates reviews across sites, but does not collect data from critics in any standard way. Instead, they adapt to the various critics' review styles and manually assign standardized scores to each, which they then aggregate. They also collect user reviews on their own site, but don't attempt to collect aggregate user review data from other sites. | |||
== See Also: == | == See Also: == |
Revision as of 22:52, 16 December 2008
This document is for listing existing formats for specifying aggregate review information.
So far, no formats have been found. However, some existing formats for reviews in general are available on the review examples page.
Sites that attempt to aggregate reviews from many sources:
- Metacritic: Metacritic aggregates reviews across sites, but does not collect data from critics in any standard way. Instead, they adapt to the various critics' review styles and manually assign standardized scores to each, which they then aggregate. They also collect user reviews on their own site, but don't attempt to collect aggregate user review data from other sites.