h-entry-feedback: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(dump of resolved classname issues from mf2 page) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Feedback and discussion about the [[h-entry]] microformat specification. | |||
Dump summaries of discussions in [[IRC]] here for future reference. | |||
== Resolved Issues == | == Resolved Issues == | ||
Revision as of 16:51, 13 June 2013
Feedback and discussion about the h-entry microformat specification.
Dump summaries of discussions in IRC here for future reference.
Resolved Issues
- 2012-245 Resolved. See 2012-243 IRC discussion/consensus for:
- Use
p-summaryinstead ofp-entry-summary. The historical semantic of "entry-summary" is not different from "summary" in any significant (or discernible way). Collapsing the two will simplify the overall microformats2 vocabularies further. In microformats2, entry-summary is no more. - Use
e-contentinstead ofe-entry-content. Same point and advantage. In microformats2, entry-content is no more. - drop
p-entry-title. Unnecessary and subsumed by "p-name". Would consider move to backward compat only if cases are presented - known publishing uses are expected to be updated shortly.
- Use