hproduct-feedback: Difference between revisions

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(comment on product IDs)
Line 1: Line 1:
Why not use DL for name-value pairs? --[[User:Etoastw|Etoastw]] 05:52, 27 Feb 2007 (PST)
Why not use DL for name-value pairs? --[[User:Etoastw|Etoastw]] 05:52, 27 Feb 2007 (PST)
Forget it, already in there :)--[[User:Etoastw|Etoastw]] 05:14, 2 Mar 2007 (PST)
Forget it, already in there :)--[[User:Etoastw|Etoastw]] 05:14, 2 Mar 2007 (PST)
On UPC and product codes:
The properties 'isbn' and 'upc' are anticipated for p-v keys. They should be extended by other common properties (p.e. 'issn') and at least the EAN, which is now world-wide standard for product codes. isbn and upc are covered by the EAN and can be converted to and from the EAN.
http://www.adams1.com/pub/russadam/isbn.html
http://www.gs1.org/
[[User:Tux|Tux]] 06:16, 31 Aug 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 13:16, 31 August 2007

Why not use DL for name-value pairs? --Etoastw 05:52, 27 Feb 2007 (PST) Forget it, already in there :)--Etoastw 05:14, 2 Mar 2007 (PST)

On UPC and product codes: The properties 'isbn' and 'upc' are anticipated for p-v keys. They should be extended by other common properties (p.e. 'issn') and at least the EAN, which is now world-wide standard for product codes. isbn and upc are covered by the EAN and can be converted to and from the EAN.

http://www.adams1.com/pub/russadam/isbn.html http://www.gs1.org/

Tux 06:16, 31 Aug 2007 (PDT)