anti-patterns: Difference between revisions
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) (→recent anti-patterns: typo, grammar, blockquote and remove plurals kludge) |
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) (anti-design-patterns) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
More than once it has been proposed to use empty hyperlinks to store machine readable information at least ''near'' the context of the related human readable information. | More than once it has been proposed to use empty hyperlinks to store machine readable information at least ''near'' the context of the related human readable information. | ||
Empty hyperlinks are still problematic for several reasons however | Empty hyperlinks are still problematic for several reasons however: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
* B, more than likely get you banned from google because it will think you are trying to spam it... | * B, more than likely get you banned from google because it will think you are trying to spam it... | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
==See also== | |||
*[[anti-design-patterns]] | |||
Revision as of 10:58, 16 December 2007
anti-patterns
This is an index page for pointing to various known anti-patterns, in particular those that have been encountered by the microformats community during the development of POSH patterns or microformats within
New anti-patterns may be documented here at first and then moved to their own page(s).
known anti-patterns
recent anti-patterns
These anti-patterns have been recently noted:
removing data from its context
HTML4 contains numerous mechanisms for storing machine data in a document in the <head> such as a list of <link> or <meta> elements.
This is an anti-pattern.
Disconnecting data (or meta-data, whatever you prefer to call it) from its context inevitably leads to corruption, and loss of fidelity. Meta keywords rotted for example. One person writes the template with the head and link and meta, and another puts the content in the page, etc.
Removing data from its context is an anti-pattern.
empty hyperlinks
More than once it has been proposed to use empty hyperlinks to store machine readable information at least near the context of the related human readable information.
Empty hyperlinks are still problematic for several reasons however:
any SEO worth his salt will know anchor text links that go nowhere, will
- A, reduce the quality of out going links from your site so reducing PR (Page Rank) and
- B, more than likely get you banned from google because it will think you are trying to spam it...