attention-brainstorming: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Experience) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* Need to define a minimally useful subset for ease of implementation and interoperability | * Need to define a minimally useful subset for ease of implementation and interoperability | ||
* Need to "chunk" any sets of additional data | * Need to "chunk" any sets of additional data | ||
== Goals / Requirements == | |||
=== Definite === | |||
* Needs to be represent sparse (over time and source) data | |||
=== Possible === | |||
* Easily converted to a stream | |||
Revision as of 21:21, 14 December 2005
Attention Brainstorming
This page is for brainstorming about ideas, proposals, constraints, requirements for an Attention microformat.
Authors
- Tim Brown
- Tantek Çelik
- Eric Hayes
- Rohit Khare
- Kevin Marks
Experience
Both Technorati and Attensa have implementation experience with Attention.XML and other attention formats.
Lessons Learned
- Hierarchy in the format gets in the way more than it helps
- Need to define a minimally useful subset for ease of implementation and interoperability
- Need to "chunk" any sets of additional data
Goals / Requirements
Definite
- Needs to be represent sparse (over time and source) data
Possible
- Easily converted to a stream