hreview-faq: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(answered book review author Q, moved question about scale of rating field from feedback to Q&A) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
#* Please read the [http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview#Field_details rating field description]. The default scale is 1 (worst) to 5 (best) and either can be changed by the author. See the [http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview#Multidimensional_Restaurant_Review multidimensional restaurant review] for an example of this. - [http://tantek.com/log/ Tantek] | #* Please read the [http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview#Field_details rating field description]. The default scale is 1 (worst) to 5 (best) and either can be changed by the author. See the [http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview#Multidimensional_Restaurant_Review multidimensional restaurant review] for an example of this. - [http://tantek.com/log/ Tantek] | ||
- | == See Also == | ||
* [[hreview-feedback|hReview feedback]] | |||
Revision as of 10:31, 16 December 2005
hReview FAQ
This page is for documenting Q&A about hReview. If you have a new question to ask, Please consider first asking your question on the microformats-discuss list.
Q&A
- How do you specify more detail for the 'type' field, e.g. for an item of type "product" that is a book, or a movie (on DVD or in a theater), or a music CD? -- paraphrased from Dougal Campbell 11:54, 21 Jun 2005 (PDT)
- The 'type' field was kept delibrately coarse and simple. Any attempt to build a thorough and meaningful taxonomy of all specific types of things that can be reviewed would be futile. Instead, the set of reviewed item types is kept small and fairly generic. Specific "typing" information about the item being reviewed should be published as tags as defined in hReview. E.g. a review of a book would be tagged with a book tag:
<a rel="tag" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book">book</a>. Similarly a movie that was a DVD should be tagged with both:<a rel="tag" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movie">movie</a> <a rel="tag" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD">DVD</a>. Or a music CD:<a rel="tag" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/music">music</a> <a rel="tag" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD">CD</a>.
- The 'type' field was kept delibrately coarse and simple. Any attempt to build a thorough and meaningful taxonomy of all specific types of things that can be reviewed would be futile. Instead, the set of reviewed item types is kept small and fairly generic. Specific "typing" information about the item being reviewed should be published as tags as defined in hReview. E.g. a review of a book would be tagged with a book tag:
- What is the difference between the 'website' and 'url' type? --Dougal Campbell 11:54, 21 Jun 2005 (PDT)
- A 'website' presumably includes everything located on that site, whereas 'url' refers only to the particular page located at the given 'url'.
- What if I want to use hReview to review a podcast? Which type should I use?
- As a podcast is typically a specific URL (often ending with ".mp3") the "url" item type should be used when publishing an hReview of a podcast.
- What is the proper 'type' to use for a restaurant?
- A restaurant is a "business".
- Is there a standard way to add information that isn't in the default list of fields? It seems like book reviews should include the author's name, but there's no obvious way to add it to the markup. The example reviews include it in the text, but it's not part of their markup. Chris Hibbert
- How do I state the scale of the rating field? Kal Ström
- Please read the rating field description. The default scale is 1 (worst) to 5 (best) and either can be changed by the author. See the multidimensional restaurant review for an example of this. - Tantek