Revision as of 23:50, 19 December 2008

cataletod

Why are content standards hard?

A brainstorm of the problems/distractions that plague typical content standards efforts. -Tantek

completeness
- based on platonic ideals of content (as opposed to human behaviors)
- edge cases
- scope/feature creep - general purposeness
- extensibility
ego
- reinvention - web and modern search engines have reduced excuses for this, but we will still have NIH behaviors even when ignorance isn't a problem.
- desire to be the "outside container" (we'll put all other stuff inside us)
self/community-design bias
- designed by technologists for technologists (as opposed to for authors)
- note: it was an *accident* that HTML was easy to learn for non-technical authors, designers, artists etc.: http://tantek.com/log/2003/0813t1158.html#handauthoring
- localization / internationalization issues (first/last name are different in some countries)
legal issues, copyrights, patents etc.

Revision as of 04:17, 16 August 2007 (view source) Chris Messina (talk \| contribs) (revert spam) ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:50, 19 December 2008 (view source) AcelcNamon (talk \| contribs) (ermonelv) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			cataletod
	= Why are content standards hard? =		= Why are content standards hard? =