gender-brainstorming: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
	
|  (→external brainstorms:  add internet archive link to dead pownce link) | m (fix syntax of example) | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| <pre><nowiki><span class="gender"> | <pre><nowiki><span class="gender"> | ||
|   <span class="gender-identity>Dude</span> |   <span class="gender-identity">Dude</span> | ||
|   (<span class="sex">male</span>) |   (<span class="sex">male</span>) | ||
| </span> | </span> | ||
Revision as of 20:15, 7 October 2010
<entry-title>gender brainstorming</entry-title>
Just some loosely collected thoughts on how to represent gender.
sex and gender identity
Gender as seen in the gender-examples and gender-formats typically has two components, sex, which is a biological indicator, and gender identity, which is social/cultural/personal.
A simple proposal is to use a small taxonomy for sex, and freeform field for gender, e.g.
- sex: M(ale) F(emale) O(ther) N(one or Not applicable)
- gender-identity: string
gender property
A shorthand or compound property "gender" could be created to represent both, while leaving the freedom of personal expression.
A compound "gender" property could be used like this (using the "Dude" alternative gender label from Pownce/Digg in the gender-examples page).
<span class="gender"> <span class="gender-identity">Dude</span> (<span class="sex">male</span>) </span>
external brainstorms
- original offline: http://pownce.com/ijustine/notes/1551822/