species: Difference between revisions
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) m (→Proposal: Wikispecies) |
AndyMabbett (talk | contribs) (→Proposal: more on usage) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Proposal== | ==Proposal== | ||
Imagine viewing a web page with a reference to a species - and being able to use an add-on to you browser to be taken directly to information about that species, on, say, Wikipedia, or Wikispecies, or another site, such as in an academic database, of your choosing. | Imagine viewing a web page with a reference to a species - and being able to use an add-on to you browser to be taken directly to information about that species, on, say, Wikipedia, or Wikispecies, or another site, such as in an academic database, of your choosing. | ||
Your software would automatically know to search site A of the scientific name referred to a moth, site B for a bird, and site C for a plant - and you could set your preferences as to which sites those were to be, and in which rder two or more were to be searched (e.g. for moths, try [http://ukmoths.org.uk/ UK Moths] first, if not found try [http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/projects/lepindex/index.html The Global Lepidoptera Names Index]. | |||
That's what a "species" microformat might do for you. | That's what a "species" microformat might do for you. |
Revision as of 14:56, 23 September 2006
Species
Introduction
People use the vernacular AND taxonomic names of species in everyday speech and writing - just read or watch any populist gardening magazine or television programme.
Consider this list: "Blackbird", "poodle", "T Rex", "potato", "French Marigold", "Wisteria", "E. Coli", "HIV", "Rubella" and "human being".
"T Rex" is "Tyrannosaurus rex"; "E. Coli" is "Escherichia coli"; "HIV" is "Human immunodeficiency virus" and "Rubella" is "Rubella virus". All are the taxonomic (or scientific) names of unique species.
"Wisteria" is a taxonomic genus.
"Blackbird"; "poodle"; "potato"; "French Marigold" and "human being" (arguments about Neanderthals not withstanding) are vernacular (or common) names, but still refer to individual species.
Proposal
Imagine viewing a web page with a reference to a species - and being able to use an add-on to you browser to be taken directly to information about that species, on, say, Wikipedia, or Wikispecies, or another site, such as in an academic database, of your choosing.
Your software would automatically know to search site A of the scientific name referred to a moth, site B for a bird, and site C for a plant - and you could set your preferences as to which sites those were to be, and in which rder two or more were to be searched (e.g. for moths, try UK Moths first, if not found try The Global Lepidoptera Names Index.
That's what a "species" microformat might do for you.
See also
Here's some work-in-progress: