process-issues-closed

From Microformats Wiki
Revision as of 20:21, 12 February 2011 by Tantek (talk | contribs) (drafted with a resolved/closed issue)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<entry-title>Closed Process Issues</entry-title>

Process issues that have been resolved and all related to-do items completed.

2005

  • 2005-07-03 raised by User:Bud
    1. I would point out that the paving the cowpaths method suggests that all you are doing is enshrining current practice. One question I asked myself is how something like reltag fits into that. hCard certainly does. Not sure about hReview. What I would say more is that you are "enabling emerging practices". Maybe you should say "widening the ferrett holes".
      • RESOLVED ACCEPTED. As with any metaphor, trying to think it through too literally will yield inaccurate results. However, given the potential for confusion this is worth some additional clarification. Explicitly noted in Document Current Behavior that cowpaths = examples, and examples = content publishing, not existing formats.

see also