aggregate-review-brainstorming

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
(Common themes amongst examples (that we might want to support))
(Common themes amongst examples (that we might want to support))
Line 11: Line 11:
** the number of reviews for each rating (i.e. 10 5-star ratings, 7 4-star ratings, etc)  
** the number of reviews for each rating (i.e. 10 5-star ratings, 7 4-star ratings, etc)  
** recurring themes about the entity being reviewed (i.e. "romantic restaurant" or "love the chicken mole").
** recurring themes about the entity being reviewed (i.e. "romantic restaurant" or "love the chicken mole").
-
** who are the reviewers (i.e. "critics" or "users"). Some sites (i.e. Rotten Tomatoes) have multiple sets of aggregate reviews to cover both critics and users.
+
** who are the reviewers (i.e. "critics" or "users"). Some sites (i.e. Rotten Tomatoes or GameSpot) have multiple sets of aggregate reviews to cover both critics and users.
* In addition, some elements already present in the hReview schema exist in aggregate reviews as well:
* In addition, some elements already present in the hReview schema exist in aggregate reviews as well:

Revision as of 03:16, 23 December 2008

Ideas for how to support aggregate reviews via microformats.


Contents

Common themes amongst examples (that we might want to support)

Proposals

1) Do nothing. Aggregation must be done by the microformats parser

2) Extend existing hReview format to include "reviewcount"

3) Define a new microformat type for aggregate reviews


Discussion

aggregate-review-brainstorming was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Views