aggregate-review-brainstorming

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
(Discussion)
(Discussion)
Line 35: Line 35:
== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
-
* Kavi: I like option #2 the best. It is simple and covers the 80% case well for supporting aggregate reviews.
+
* Kavi: option #2 seems simple and covers the 80% case well for supporting aggregate reviews.
== See Also ==
== See Also ==
* Aggregate reviews: [[aggregate-review-examples|examples]] - [[aggregate-review-formats|formats]]
* Aggregate reviews: [[aggregate-review-examples|examples]] - [[aggregate-review-formats|formats]]
* [[hreview|hReview]]
* [[hreview|hReview]]

Revision as of 23:12, 12 January 2009

Ideas for how to support aggregate reviews via microformats.


Contents

Common themes amongst examples (that we might want to support)

Proposals

1) Do nothing. Aggregation must be done by the microformats parser

2) Extend existing hReview format to include "reviewcount"

3) Define a new microformat type for aggregate reviews

Discussion

See Also

aggregate-review-brainstorming was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Views