Difference between revisions of "anti-design-patterns"

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (Reverted edits by BaszeLlida (Talk) to last version by AndyMabbett)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
Problems:
 
Problems:
* Indicating the ''type'' of the information does not indicate the ''semantic''. This was one of the mistakes in the design of XML-RPC and should not be propagated to rel values.
+
* Indicating the ''type'' of the information does not indicate the ''semantic''. This was one of the mistakes in the design of XML-RPC '''(citation needed)''' and should not be propagated to rel values.
* In particular such a rel value failes to capture and represent/indicate an explicit semantic, like "this over here is my hCard". See [[hcard-brainstorming#Auto-Discovery|hCard brainstorming on auto-discovery]] for current thoughts on this problem.
+
* In particular such a rel value fails to capture and represent/indicate an explicit semantic, like "this over here is my hCard". See [[hcard-brainstorming#Auto-Discovery|hCard brainstorming on auto-discovery]] for current thoughts on this problem.
  
== See Also ==
+
== See also ==
* [[design-patterns]]
+
*[[design-patterns]]
 +
*[[anti-patterns]]
 +
*[[social-network-anti-patterns]]

Latest revision as of 19:00, 20 December 2008

anti-design-patterns

Just as there are design-patterns to encourage and follow, there are anti-design-patterns to discourage and avoid.

rel formatname

rel="formatname", e.g. rel="hcard"

Problems:

  • Indicating the type of the information does not indicate the semantic. This was one of the mistakes in the design of XML-RPC (citation needed) and should not be propagated to rel values.
  • In particular such a rel value fails to capture and represent/indicate an explicit semantic, like "this over here is my hCard". See hCard brainstorming on auto-discovery for current thoughts on this problem.

See also