Difference between revisions of "attention-brainstorming"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
== Strawman Schema Thoughts == | == Strawman Schema Thoughts == | ||
− | + | === Each Attention Item contains === | |
− | + | ||
− | ** | + | * last read |
− | ** | + | * duration |
− | ** | + | * followed links |
+ | * rel/voatlink | ||
+ | * tags | ||
+ | * dateremoved | ||
+ | * read state | ||
+ | * rating | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Item Containers === | ||
+ | |||
+ | * . | ||
== See Also == | == See Also == | ||
* [[attention-examples]] | * [[attention-examples]] | ||
* [[attention-formats]] | * [[attention-formats]] |
Revision as of 21:45, 14 December 2005
Contents
Attention Brainstorming
This page is for brainstorming about ideas, proposals, constraints, requirements for an Attention microformat.
Authors
- Tim Brown
- Tantek Çelik
- Eric Hayes
- Rohit Khare
- Kevin Marks
Experience
Both Technorati and Attensa have implementation experience with Attention.XML and other attention formats.
Other Attention-like Things
Lessons Learned
- Hierarchy in the format gets in the way more than it helps
- Need to define a minimally useful subset for ease of implementation and interoperability
- Need to "chunk" any sets of additional data
Goals / Requirements
Definite
- Needs to be represent sparse (over time and source) data
- "Blendable" - get an attention "chunk" every day from a source and be able to aggregate the chunks into one attention file.
- Flat by default. Permit hierarchy but don't require it, and don't require parsing of a hierarchy (i.e. allow treating the attention as set of attention items).
Strawman Schema Thoughts
Each Attention Item contains
- last read
- duration
- followed links
- rel/voatlink
- tags
- dateremoved
- read state
- rating
Item Containers
- .