Difference between revisions of "digitalsignature-brainstorming"

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Getting Discussion started)
m (noolodrondro)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
eldarro
 
<h1>Digital Signatures Brainstorming</h1>
 
<h1>Digital Signatures Brainstorming</h1>
  
Line 26: Line 27:
  
 
== Discussion participants ==
 
== Discussion participants ==
* Henrich C. Pöhls, [http://www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/SVS/personnel/henrich/index.php University of Hamburg]
+
* Henrich C. Pöhls, [http://www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/SVS/personnel/henrich/index.php University of Hamburg]
 
* Add your name if you feel you have made significant additions to the page.
 
* Add your name if you feel you have made significant additions to the page.
  
 
== Proposal/ overview ==
 
== Proposal/ overview ==
 
This page is a companion to '''[[digital-signatures]]'''. Please read that page first, and then return here to discuss and post ideas/ examples.
 
This page is a companion to '''[[digital-signatures]]'''. Please read that page first, and then return here to discuss and post ideas/ examples.

Revision as of 21:22, 5 January 2009

eldarro

Digital Signatures Brainstorming

Henrich Poehls

I would like to start discussing the possibility of digitally signing Microformatted content.

A Microformat carrying a digital signature could be used in conjunction with other already defined Microformats like hcard, hcalendar or hreview. As our proposed Microformat for digital signatures is content agnostic it can be used to build compound signed Microformats from all existing and future Microformats.

This is part of ongoing research aiming to protect content, especially content that has been made machine-readable through the use of semantic annotations. I have plenty of ideas and further use cases.

  • Why a new Microformat?

I think signing a "Microformat" (aka Microformatted Content) shall be possible within "Microformats" (so itself a microformat). Such as XML can be signed and the Signature stored in XML as well.

  • Why signing Microformatted content?

Microformats facilitate reuse of semantically annotated content. It allows services and applications to cut&paste, convert, re-publish, link-to, cite Microformatted content. In any of these cases it might be interesting to see who the original author was. Additionally viewers want to verify authorship. Digital Signatures offer just this, Origin-Authentication.

Trace-back allows to find a "bigger", more complete version of Microformatted content. Trace-back only verifies that the pointer used for trace-back is now "self referencing". Trace-back will then verify the content's source based on a URI/URL.

IMHO this is a weaker "form of authenticity" than that achieved by a digital signatures.

Also digital signatures are more versatile:

  • Digital signatures add authenticity without the need to trace links back to some URL, so reduces the overhead if the content at view is "authoritative enough".
  • Digital signatures allow to add authority to content that is placed on foreign URLs (e.g. Signing your whole Comment you left on a foreing Blog).


Discussion participants

  • Henrich C. Pöhls, University of Hamburg
  • Add your name if you feel you have made significant additions to the page.

Proposal/ overview

This page is a companion to digital-signatures. Please read that page first, and then return here to discuss and post ideas/ examples.