h-review-feedback

From Microformats Wiki
Revision as of 15:22, 13 March 2014 by Barnabywalters (talk | contribs) (→‎Consistency with other microformats: added e-description => e-content proposal, signed)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Feedback and discussion of h-review. Summarise any useful conclusions from discussions in #microformats on freenode here.

Consistency with other microformats

Some h-review properties are extremely similar to more generic, reusable properties in other microformats such as h-entry, h-recipe:

  • p-reviewer => p-author
  • dt-reviewed => dt-published
  • e-description => e-content

What is the value of duplicating these properties? Could they be merged, increasing consistency between microformats and reducing total amount of surface area which must be remembered? As there are almost no microformats2 h-reviews in the wild, right now would be a good time to make these changes --bw 15:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)