Difference between revisions of "html5-profile-issues"

From Microformats Wiki
html5-profile-issues
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
 
This is a request for clarification.
 
This is a request for clarification.
  
This document is in the public domain. If the W3C HTML Working Group accepts to take on the proposal as a deliverable, should contributions from the Working Group participants be in the public domain as well, or remain under the W3C Document license? As owner of [http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/29 ACTION-29] in the WG, I'm interested in gathering rationals in both approaches.
+
This document is in the public domain. If the W3C HTML Working Group accepts to take on the proposal as a deliverable, should contributions from the Working Group participants expected to be in the public domain as well, or can they remain under the W3C Document license? As owner of [http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/29 ACTION-29] in the WG, I'm interested in gathering rationals in both approaches.
  
 
== template ==
 
== template ==

Revision as of 00:05, 20 February 2010

<entry-title>HTML5 profile attribute issues </entry-title>

These are externally raised issues about the HTML5 Profile Attribute with broadly varying degrees of merit. Thus some issues are REJECTED for a number of obvious reasons (but still documented here in case they are re-raised), and others contain longer discussions. Some issues may be ACCEPTED and perhaps cause changes or improved explanations in the spec.

IMPORTANT: Please read the HTML5 Profile Attribute FAQ and the HTML5 Profile Attribute resolved issues before giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered.

Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — Tantek

closed issues

See: html5-profile-issues-closed

resolved issues

See: html5-profile-issues-resolved

issues

Please add new issues to the bottom of the list by copy and pasting the template. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.

2010

  • Copyright statement

This is a request for clarification.

This document is in the public domain. If the W3C HTML Working Group accepts to take on the proposal as a deliverable, should contributions from the Working Group participants expected to be in the public domain as well, or can they remain under the W3C Document license? As owner of ACTION-29 in the WG, I'm interested in gathering rationals in both approaches.

template

Consider using this format (copy and paste this to the end of the list to add your issues; replace ~~~ with an external link if preferred) to report issues or feedback, so that issues can show up in hAtom subscriptions of this issues page. If open issues lack this markup, please add it.

Please post one issue per entry, to make them easier to manage. Avoid combining multiple issues into single reports, as this can confuse or muddle feedback, and puts a burden of separating the discrete issues onto someone else who 1. may not have the time, and 2. may not understand the issue in the same way as the original reporter.

<div class="hentry">
{{OpenIssue}} 
<span class="entry-summary author vcard">
 <span class="published">2011-MM-DD</span> 
 raised by <span class="fn">~~~</span>
</span>
<div class="entry-content discussion issues">
* <strong class="entry-title">«Short title of issue»</strong>. «Description of Issue»
** Follow-up comment #1
** Follow-up comment #2
</div>
</div>

related pages