invisible data considered harmful

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
(invisible metadata failures: adding Wikipedia persondata)
(invisible metadata failures: PERSONDATA has been deprecated! Hallelujah!)
Line 31: Line 31:
* Wikipedia's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Persondata persondata] template
* Wikipedia's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Persondata persondata] template
** Contains invisible data. Not necessarily updated when someone dies or when errors are found.
** Contains invisible data. Not necessarily updated when someone dies or when errors are found.
 +
** [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29/Archive_122#RfC:_Should_Persondata_template_be_deprecated_and_methodically_removed_from_articles.3F Deprecated on 2015-05-26].
== related ==
== related ==

Revision as of 09:45, 16 June 2015


This article is a stub.

Invisible data or metadata for that matter is undesirable. The general problem with invisible data is that being invisible, nobody sees when it's wrong. If something is wrong on a web page and it's visible, a visitor can see it, a page author (without technical abilities) can see it. Invisible data doesn't get seen and errors inside it are not found as easily as visible data is.

See Principles of visibility and human friendliness.

Also known as, "dark data", "meta tags", "side files".

invisible metadata failures

related

invisible data considered harmful was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Views