licensing: Difference between revisions

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(group/simplify use case hypotheses to "What" and "How to attribute".)
(→‎Usecases hypothesis: added obvious "what is the license" use case hypothesis - thanks Hixie)
Line 15: Line 15:
=== Usecases hypothesis ===
=== Usecases hypothesis ===


* '''License''' that is used
** Human copyright owner expresses license
** Human viewer clearly understands what is the license being used
** Machine-precise reference to the license
** search engines discovering which license is used
* '''What''' is licensed (whole page, part of page, external resource etc.)
* '''What''' is licensed (whole page, part of page, external resource etc.)
** Human copyright owner expresses license and what is licensed
** Human copyright owner expresses what is licensed
** Human viewer clearly understands what is licensed and how
** Human viewer clearly understands what is licensed
** Machine-precise semantic for what is licensed
** Machine-precise semantic for what is licensed
** search engines discovering what is licensed
** search engines discovering what is licensed

Revision as of 19:51, 30 April 2009

Licensing

This is a page for tracking the effort to develop means for authors and publishers to indicate licensing and attribution requirements about web pages and media (e.g. audio, video, images) that they create and publish, possibly within the context of a still in-development media-info microformat.

Per the microformats process:

Introduction

Initially based on discussion captured here with a focus on the attribution requirements of Creative Commons licenses.

Usecases hypothesis

  • License that is used
    • Human copyright owner expresses license
    • Human viewer clearly understands what is the license being used
    • Machine-precise reference to the license
    • search engines discovering which license is used
  • What is licensed (whole page, part of page, external resource etc.)
    • Human copyright owner expresses what is licensed
    • Human viewer clearly understands what is licensed
    • Machine-precise semantic for what is licensed
    • search engines discovering what is licensed
  • How to attribute (if necessary)
    • ability to generate attribution/reference
    • Licensee (republisher or creator of derivative) expression of original's attribution and copyright notice requirements
    • In the case of a derivative, also expression of all of the previous for the new work

80% requirements

  • State a work (any copyrightable thing, i.e., a "fixed expression") is available under a license
    • simple rel-license works for web pages
    • anything with a URL (fragment IDs, embedded media)
  • Name of author
  • Name/title of work
  • Link to copyright holder specified URL (attribution URL)
  • URL where you can potentially get information on buying or commercially licensing the work

20% requirements

  • Licensor waives attribution
  • Credit identifying the use of the Work in the Derivative Work (e.g., "French translation of the Work by Original Author," or "Screenplay based on original Work by Original Author").
  • How to make a donation related to the work.

See also

  • rel-license outside any other microformat denotes a license for a web page at that granularity.
  • media-info is a likely candidate microformat for including licensing and attribution information.
  • CC Attribution license section 4 lays out legal attribution requirements for users of CC licensed works.