(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
(add self, resort by apparent family-name alpha sort order, +1 to Pfefferle)
(Interested List: added self to interested list)
Line 83: Line 83:
* [[User:Pfefferle]] - <span class="url">http://twitter.com/pfefferle</span> & <span class="url">http://twitter.com/mikroformate</span>
* [[User:Pfefferle]] - <span class="url">http://twitter.com/pfefferle</span> & <span class="url">http://twitter.com/mikroformate</span>
** +1 [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] 22:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
** +1 [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] 22:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
* [[User:EdwardOConnor|Ted]]

Revision as of 20:38, 15 October 2009

Microformateers is a Twitter account providing quick answers to people's questions about microformats. Twitter is full of people with short queries about syntax, or remarking upon things they've read about microformats. Microformats.org already runs the @microformats account for pushing news and announcements, but the microformateers effort is about responding.


What is this?

Microformateers is a single Twitter account, shared between a number of individual contributors. They monitor Twitter searches for mentions of microformats and related terms, and respond directly and publicly to people's lazy-web questions, ideally within 140 characters. Where longer code examples are required, code snippets areposted to gist.

Who are the microformateers?

Because of the mechanics of Twitter (a single account, shared with a single password) it is not possible for the Microformateers account to be open to all. The following agents are currently ‘on duty’:

Frances Berriman (^FB)


Tantek Çelik (^T)


Response Process

Interested List

If you're interested in becoming an agent for the microformateers, please add your name to the list below. There are a couple of constraints on this system: First is trust and security, simply because Twitter's account model requires sharing the same master password for the @microformateers account between all participants; we have to be conservative with proliferation. The second issue is meeting volume of demand. At present, we think that 4/5 agents is about the right number to be involved given the volume of questions and content that come through Twitter. But, as agents come and go, or as question demand increases we'll refer to this list. Thanks. (Technical solutions to make sharing Twitter accounts safer and accountable are also up for future consideration.) —BenWard 21:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Microformateers was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969