page-summary-formats: Difference between revisions

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(fix miosconceptions & grammar)
(Use more neutral (and common, on other pages) laguages)
Line 13: Line 13:
Google search results display the value of the meta description element for a page when that page is listed in Google search results.
Google search results display the value of the meta description element for a page when that page is listed in Google search results.


===Flaws===
===Issues===


* '''Invisible.''' meta description is invisible metadata on the page and therefore violates microformats principles.
* '''Invisible.''' meta description is invisible metadata on the page and therefore violates microformats principles.
Line 40: Line 40:
**[http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/ladywalk/latest.htm Ladywalk News]
**[http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/ladywalk/latest.htm Ladywalk News]


===Flaws===
===Issues===


* '''Invisible.''' Though different from meta description in that the <code>link</code> tag is used to relate to a summary at another URL - this doesn't actually markup the summary content itself. Since the content is not necessarily visible on the page itself, an author could easily change the page content without noticing or even knowing to bother to change the referenced "summary" page/ resource (except, of course, where the microsummary is automatically generated, such as extracting the first "H2", or the content of a div or span with a specific ID, or the last-updated date). Thus this method has all the same potential flaws of typical invisible metadata publishing, which is that overtime it may rot, become out of date, unreliable and untrustworthy in general.
* '''Invisible.''' Though different from meta description in that the <code>link</code> tag is used to relate to a summary at another URL - this doesn't actually markup the summary content itself. Since the content is not necessarily visible on the page itself, an author could easily change the page content without noticing or even knowing to bother to change the referenced "summary" page/ resource (except, of course, where the microsummary is automatically generated, such as by extracting the first "H2", or the content of a div or span with a specific ID, or the last-updated date). Thus this method has all the same potential flaws of typical invisible metadata publishing, which is that overtime it may rot, become out of date, unreliable and untrustworthy in general.


* '''Depends on <code>head</code> element.''' This summary format may depend on the author having access to the head element which in many (most?) web authoring/ publishing scenarios the content author has no access.
* '''Depends on <code>head</code> element.''' This summary format may depend on the author having access to the head element which in many (most?) web authoring/ publishing scenarios the content author has no access.

Revision as of 12:18, 3 November 2006

Page Summary Formats

This page describes existing formats that enable an author to publish a summary description for a page. Whether or not this is worthy of doing research (e.g. page-summary-examples, page-summary-brainstorming) for a microformat is open to debate. Nonetheless, it doesn't hurt to at least have a place to document existing formats.

Meta description

HTML4.01 provides meta description as an example in Appendix B: Performance, Implementation, and Design Notes of the HTML 4.01 spec. E.g.

<META name="description" content="Idyllic European vacations">

Product Support

Google search results display the value of the meta description element for a page when that page is listed in Google search results.

Issues

  • Invisible. meta description is invisible metadata on the page and therefore violates microformats principles.
  • Depends on head element. This summary format depends on the author having access to the head element which in many (most?) web authoring/ publishing scenarios the content author has no access.

Microsummary

Mozilla has introduced a proprietary format called "microsummary", which is used in Firefox 2.0's support for bookmarks.

Documentation

Code

Examples of discussion

Firefox extension

Examples

Issues

  • Invisible. Though different from meta description in that the link tag is used to relate to a summary at another URL - this doesn't actually markup the summary content itself. Since the content is not necessarily visible on the page itself, an author could easily change the page content without noticing or even knowing to bother to change the referenced "summary" page/ resource (except, of course, where the microsummary is automatically generated, such as by extracting the first "H2", or the content of a div or span with a specific ID, or the last-updated date). Thus this method has all the same potential flaws of typical invisible metadata publishing, which is that overtime it may rot, become out of date, unreliable and untrustworthy in general.
  • Depends on head element. This summary format may depend on the author having access to the head element which in many (most?) web authoring/ publishing scenarios the content author has no access.