plain-xml

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
(add Mark Pilgrim's article XML on the Web Has Failed from 2004!)
Current revision (13:30, 11 October 2017) (view source)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown.)
Line 3: Line 3:
== Reference ==
== Reference ==
W3C XML home page: <abbr title="eXtensible Markup Language">[http://www.w3.org/XML/ W3C XML]</abbr>
W3C XML home page: <abbr title="eXtensible Markup Language">[http://www.w3.org/XML/ W3C XML]</abbr>
 +
 +
== Tools==
 +
 +
* https://codebeautify.org/xmlviewer - Tool to edit, format, and validate XML.
 +
* https://jsonformatter.org/xml-formatter - XML Formatter - to format xml data.
== Criticism ==
== Criticism ==

Current revision

Contents

Plain XML

Reference

W3C XML home page: W3C XML

Tools

Criticism

A collection of critical thoughts on "plain" or "generic" XML, why it can be considered harmful etc.

Doomed

Back when I saw Douglas Crockford speak on JSON at the Silicon Valley Code Camp on 2006-10-07, I realized that with HTML+microformats for document content (user authored data), and JSON for API data (machine generated data), where did that leave XML? Nowhere it seems. I asked Douglas Crockford after his session, and have been mentioning it informally to a few people since, partially to get critical feedback on my reasoning, and partially to pass on a general questioning of the XML religion. It seems that this meme has been propagating quite well. Tantek 16:46, 31 Jan 2007 (PST)

plain-xml was last modified: Wednesday, October 11th, 2017

Views