Closed Process Issues

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
(resolve and close 2007 issues)
Current revision (03:06, 15 June 2011) (view source)
(Updated link to Bitmunk/hAudio case study)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
== 2007 ==
== 2007 ==
-
* 2007-09-07 raised by [http://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/Haudio-case-study#Problems_Encountered_with_Microformats Manu Sporny]
+
* 2007-09-07 raised by [http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/bitmunk-case-study/ Manu Sporny]
*# Issue 1: What constitutes "Enough Examples"
*# Issue 1: What constitutes "Enough Examples"
*#* RESOLVED ACCEPTED FAQ. Added to [[process-faq]]: Some amount of diversity among large sites (e.g. social content hosts), small sites (independent publishers) helps to provide a good amount of research. If you're not sure, ask in [[IRC]] and on the mailing lists.
*#* RESOLVED ACCEPTED FAQ. Added to [[process-faq]]: Some amount of diversity among large sites (e.g. social content hosts), small sites (independent publishers) helps to provide a good amount of research. If you're not sure, ask in [[IRC]] and on the mailing lists.
*# Issue 2: Proper interpretation of W3C standards
*# Issue 2: Proper interpretation of W3C standards
*#* RESOLVED REJECTED NO INFO. Too little information, nothing actionable, and link is dead "DBWiki has a problem". Next time, please include entire issue here rather than offsite. - [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] 20:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
*#* RESOLVED REJECTED NO INFO. Too little information, nothing actionable, and link is dead "DBWiki has a problem". Next time, please include entire issue here rather than offsite. - [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] 20:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
*#* REOPEN REQUEST - case study exists here: http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/bitmunk-case-study/
*# Issue 3: Keeping up with changes to the process becomes frustrating
*# Issue 3: Keeping up with changes to the process becomes frustrating
*#* RESOLVED REJECTED NO INFO. Too little information, nothing actionable, and link is dead "DBWiki has a problem". Next time, please include entire issue here rather than offsite. - [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] 20:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
*#* RESOLVED REJECTED NO INFO. Too little information, nothing actionable, and link is dead "DBWiki has a problem". Next time, please include entire issue here rather than offsite. - [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] 20:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
*#* REOPEN REQUEST - case study exists here: http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/bitmunk-case-study/
*# Issue 4: There is no clear order of operations for "The Process". This makes uF creation a trial-and-error process that can frustrate new members, that may waste time on things that don't matter. It also annoys old members of the community, that have to answer the same questions over and over again.
*# Issue 4: There is no clear order of operations for "The Process". This makes uF creation a trial-and-error process that can frustrate new members, that may waste time on things that don't matter. It also annoys old members of the community, that have to answer the same questions over and over again.
*#* RESOLVED ACCEPTED. [[process]] order has been clarified. In addition, if you see a common question on email etc., please add it as a [[process-issue]] suggested FAQ and we can answer and add it to the [[process-faq]].
*#* RESOLVED ACCEPTED. [[process]] order has been clarified. In addition, if you see a common question on email etc., please add it as a [[process-issue]] suggested FAQ and we can answer and add it to the [[process-faq]].

Current revision


Process issues that have been resolved and all related to-do items completed.

2005

2007

see also

Closed Process Issues was last modified: Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

Views