rel-license-issues: Difference between revisions

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
*# ''Issue H-1: This specification is lacking a user agent conformance section. There's basically nothing that says how rel=license must be handled.
*# ''Issue H-1: This specification is lacking a user agent conformance section. There's basically nothing that says how rel=license must be handled.
*# ''Issue H-2: What's the point of rel="license"?
*# ''Issue H-2: What's the point of rel="license"?
* 2005-12-09 raised by Kenny Heaton
*# ''There needs to be an explicit explanation of when to use rel-license which "Indicates that the referred resource is a license for the referring page.", and when to use the W3C defined copyright link type which "Refers to a copyright statement for the current document." since copyright and licensing are similar concepts and can be confused.

Revision as of 22:23, 9 December 2005

Issues

  • 2005-06-21 raised by Hixie
    1. Issue H-1: This specification is lacking a user agent conformance section. There's basically nothing that says how rel=license must be handled.
    2. Issue H-2: What's the point of rel="license"?
  • 2005-12-09 raised by Kenny Heaton
    1. There needs to be an explicit explanation of when to use rel-license which "Indicates that the referred resource is a license for the referring page.", and when to use the W3C defined copyright link type which "Refers to a copyright statement for the current document." since copyright and licensing are similar concepts and can be confused.