rel-tag-feedback

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
m (==Related pages==)
(General Comments)
Line 14: Line 14:
* The heavy reliance on IMO poorly-conceived URL structures as "de facto best practice" means that some people who wish to provide a "tag here!" indicator in their markup can't play in your sandbox. A better solution would either take the content of the '''a''' tag as the tag, or would permit some sort of pattern-matching specification to point consumers of your tag to the "tag" portion of the URL. See [[rel-tag-issues]]. [[User:JonathanFeinberg|JonathanFeinberg]] 11:37, 9 Feb 2006 (PST)
* The heavy reliance on IMO poorly-conceived URL structures as "de facto best practice" means that some people who wish to provide a "tag here!" indicator in their markup can't play in your sandbox. A better solution would either take the content of the '''a''' tag as the tag, or would permit some sort of pattern-matching specification to point consumers of your tag to the "tag" portion of the URL. See [[rel-tag-issues]]. [[User:JonathanFeinberg|JonathanFeinberg]] 11:37, 9 Feb 2006 (PST)
 +
 +
* I agree with the above one. I'd like to implement this tagging microformat, but am unable to because my URL's don't match the restrictions. This doesn't seem to be in the spirit of microformats either, which states that they "intend to solve simpler problems first by adapting to current behaviors and usage patterns".
==Related pages==
==Related pages==
{{rel-tag-related-pages}}
{{rel-tag-related-pages}}

Revision as of 05:01, 18 January 2007

Contents

rel-tag feedback

This document is for keeping track of feedback about rel-tag, one of several microformats.

Feedback

General Questions

See the rel-tag FAQ and rel FAQ.

Issues

See rel-tag-issues.

General Comments

Related pages

The rel-tag specification is a work in progress. As additional aspects are discussed, understood, and written, they will be added. These thoughts, issues, and questions are kept in separate pages.

rel-tag-feedback was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Views