Revision as of 19:37, 9 February 2006

rel-tag feedback

This document is for keeping track of feedback about rel-tag, one of several microformats.

Mary Hodder's published usability study with bloggers regarding tags Her conclusion: Bloggers asked for better tagging options and more licensing options.

The heavy reliance on IMO poorly-conceived URL structures as "de facto best practice" means that some people who wish to provide a "tag here!" indicator in their markup can't play in your sandbox. A better solution would either take the content of the a tag as the tag, or would permit some sort of pattern-matching specification to point consumers of your tag to the "tag" portion of the URL. See rel-tag-issues. JonathanFeinberg 11:37, 9 Feb 2006 (PST)

Revision as of 23:49, 23 January 2006 (view source) Tantek (talk \| contribs) m (→‎General Comments) ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:37, 9 February 2006 (view source) JonathanFeinberg (talk \| contribs) (→‎General Comments) Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	* [http://napsterization.org/stories/archives/000569.html Mary Hodder's published usability study with bloggers regarding tags] Her conclusion: Bloggers asked for better tagging options and more licensing options.		* [http://napsterization.org/stories/archives/000569.html Mary Hodder's published usability study with bloggers regarding tags] Her conclusion: Bloggers asked for better tagging options and more licensing options.

			* The heavy reliance on IMO poorly-conceived URL structures as "de facto best practice" means that some people who wish to provide a "tag here!" indicator in their markup can't play in your sandbox. A better solution would either take the content of the '''a''' tag as the tag, or would permit some sort of pattern-matching specification to point consumers of your tag to the "tag" portion of the URL. See [[rel-tag-issues]]. [[User:JonathanFeinberg\|JonathanFeinberg]] 11:37, 9 Feb 2006 (PST)