rel-tag-issues

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 33: Line 33:
*#* Clarification: By '/tag' do you mean '/<tag-name>'? --[[User:RyanKing|RyanKing]] 15:21, 9 Feb 2006 (PST)
*#* Clarification: By '/tag' do you mean '/<tag-name>'? --[[User:RyanKing|RyanKing]] 15:21, 9 Feb 2006 (PST)
*#*:* yes -- rob yates 18:56, 9 Feb 2006 (EST)
*#*:* yes -- rob yates 18:56, 9 Feb 2006 (EST)
 +
*#* I wanted to do a quick survey to see how many other sites would struggle to easily adopt this format, due to the fact that they don't currently end their tag urls '/<tag-name>'.  While I definately agree that ending with '/<tag-name>' is a best practice, I do feel that their needs to be an option for sites that don't do this, but still want to semantically tag their tags.  Here's some sites that I found that cannot easily adopt reltag without reworking server side logic. There's some pretty big names on this list.
 +
*#*:* O'Reilly.com.  See the tags at this url http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/11/10/delicious.html
 +
*#*:* Dodgeball.  http://boston.dodgeball.com/tags.php
 +
*#*:* Any typepad blog.  See for instance the categories here http://ideasinfood.typepad.com/ideas_in_food/
 +
*#*:* Eventful.  http://eventful.com/

Revision as of 16:26, 12 February 2006

relTag Issues

These are externally raised issues about rel-tag with broadly varying degrees of merit. Thus some issues are REJECTED for a number of obvious reasons (but still documented here in case they are re-raised), and others contain longer discussions. Some issues may be ACCEPTED and perhaps cause changes or improved explanations in the spec. Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — Tantek

Issues

Please use this format:


rel-tag-issues was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Views