rel-tag-issues

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
(backing out)
(Issues)
Line 14: Line 14:
*# ''Issue H-1: This specification is lacking a user agent conformance section. Does the UA simply crawl the DOM looking for all <html:a> elements with a "rel" attribute that contains a "tag" keyword (after space-separated splitting) and then grab the href="" value? How about relative links? Must they implement xml:base? <html:base>? Other things?
*# ''Issue H-1: This specification is lacking a user agent conformance section. Does the UA simply crawl the DOM looking for all <html:a> elements with a "rel" attribute that contains a "tag" keyword (after space-separated splitting) and then grab the href="" value? How about relative links? Must they implement xml:base? <html:base>? Other things?
*# ''Issue H-2: What's the point? Isn't free-text search more effective than relying on people to remember to put a particular tag?
*# ''Issue H-2: What's the point? Isn't free-text search more effective than relying on people to remember to put a particular tag?
 +
 +
* 2006-01-10 raised by Adam Willard
 +
*# ''Issue 1: Somewhat confused. Please either fix or elaborate the difference in the URLs in the Tag Spaces area -> is it /tag/ or /tags/.''

Revision as of 18:27, 10 January 2006

relTag Issues

These are externally raised issues about rel-tag with broadly varying degrees of merit. Thus some issues are REJECTED for a number of obvious reasons (but still documented here in case they are re-raised), and others contain longer discussions. Some issues may be ACCEPTED and perhaps cause changes or improved explanations in the spec. Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well. — Tantek

Issues

Please use this format:


rel-tag-issues was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Views