review-brainstorming

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
m (Thoughts on a Microformat)
(hReview 0.3 brainstorming summary)
Line 36: Line 36:
See [[hreview|hReview]] for the result and evolution of these thoughts on a microformat.
See [[hreview|hReview]] for the result and evolution of these thoughts on a microformat.
 +
 +
== hReview 0.3 thoughts ==
 +
 +
This iteration of hReview is directly in response to [[hreview-feedback]] and [[hreview-issues]].  See those documents for more details.
 +
 +
Changes from hReview 0.2:
 +
 +
* MUST (instead of SHOULD) use [[hcard|hCard]] for the item description of a business
 +
* MUST (instead of SHOULD) use [[hcard|hCard]] to represent reviewer information
 +
* make reviewer *optional* per feedback from Ryan King and Mark Nottingham
 +
* SHOULD use [[hcalendar|hCalendar]] to represent an item of 'type' 'event'
 +
* add one decimal digit of precision to ratings' numerical values.
 +
* use [http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#Value_excerpting the "value" construct from hCard] (as it is used in "tel" properties for example) to more explicitly markup the rating value when also providing (marking up) the best/worst of a rating.  need to also provide an example that does so.
 +
* add [[rel-license]] to indicate the license of the hReview as a whole.

Revision as of 22:33, 26 January 2006

Review Brainstorming

There have been several efforts to define data formats for posting "reviews" of products, services etc. on the Web.

This page serves to document the brainstorming and ideas resulting from analysis of review examples from real world sites for the design of a simple reviews microformat. -Tantek

Contents


Contributors

Copied from reviews-formats which itself was contributed from Technorati Developer's Wiki: ReviewsFormats)

See Also


Thoughts on a Microformat for a review

Thoughts towards a simple microformat subset of earlier efforts, sufficient to express 80/20 of real world review examples on the Web.

Common review fields

See hReview for the result and evolution of these thoughts on a microformat.

hReview 0.3 thoughts

This iteration of hReview is directly in response to hreview-feedback and hreview-issues. See those documents for more details.

Changes from hReview 0.2:

review-brainstorming was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Views