review-brainstorming

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search
m
(issue resolutions accepted.)
Line 53: Line 53:
* use [http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#Value_excerpting the "value" construct from hCard] (as it is used in "tel" properties for example) to more explicitly markup the rating value when also providing (marking up) the best/worst of a rating.  need to also provide an example that does so.
* use [http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#Value_excerpting the "value" construct from hCard] (as it is used in "tel" properties for example) to more explicitly markup the rating value when also providing (marking up) the best/worst of a rating.  need to also provide an example that does so.
* add [[rel-license]] to indicate the license of the hReview as a whole.
* add [[rel-license]] to indicate the license of the hReview as a whole.
 +
** add this to [[hatom]] as well!
* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.
* permit tags inside ratings to denote rated tags, the same as ratings inside tags per suggestion from Eran Globen.
Informative improvements:
Informative improvements:
* Note that scalar/rated tags would ideally use a tag space that explain the ratings for that tag.  E.g. what does Food:18/30 mean?
* Note that scalar/rated tags would ideally use a tag space that explain the ratings for that tag.  E.g. what does Food:18/30 mean?

Revision as of 23:24, 21 February 2006

Review Brainstorming

There have been several efforts to define data formats for posting "reviews" of products, services etc. on the Web.

This page serves to document the brainstorming and ideas resulting from analysis of review examples from real world sites for the design of a simple reviews microformat. -Tantek

Contents


Contributors

Copied from reviews-formats which itself was contributed from Technorati Developer's Wiki: ReviewsFormats)

See Also


Thoughts on a Microformat for a review

Thoughts towards a simple microformat subset of earlier efforts, sufficient to express 80/20 of real world review examples on the Web.

Common review fields

See hReview for the result and evolution of these thoughts on a microformat.

hReview 0.3 thoughts

This iteration of hReview is directly in response to hreview-feedback and hreview-issues. See those documents for more details.

Changes from hReview 0.2:

Informative improvements:

review-brainstorming was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Views